A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Safety of GA flying



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 26th 06, 01:51 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default Safety of GA flying

Thomas Borchert schrieb:

One might also say you posted a meaningless number and I asked you to
put meaning to it. ;-)


One might. On the other hand, one might also say that you asked a
rhetorical question and are not even interested in the answer, otherwise
you would jump on the source and look for the answer yourself.

Stefan
  #2  
Old July 26th 06, 02:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default Safety of GA flying

Stefan,

one might also say that you asked a
rhetorical question


What I really did was ask Mr. Rubble to explain how much of a "part of
the equation the reliability of piston engines" really is - after he
stated it was.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #3  
Old July 26th 06, 02:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default Safety of GA flying

Thomas Borchert schrieb:

What I really did was ask Mr. Rubble to explain how much of a "part of
the equation the reliability of piston engines" really is - after he
stated it was.


I've read this very question over and over from you. At some point, I
said to myself why doesn't this guy just look up the answer?

BTW: According to the BFU Bulletin, in January 2006 it was 75% of the
reported accidents/incidents/whatever in Germany (counting only the
light SEPs).

Oh, and BTW(2): I had one incident when the tug lost its power just
after being airborne while I was in the glider behind. Believe me or
not, at that moment, I wasn't interested the least bit in statistics. I
survived and so did the glider I flew, but it was, well, a moment to
remember.

Stefan
  #4  
Old July 26th 06, 09:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
steve[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default Safety of GA flying in U.S.

FYI,

It shows that accident rate per 100,000 hours going up slightly. I would
prefer it go down, but plan to keep flying in any event. I am too addicted
to it.

Here is some info I pulled from the FAA.gov site.

Executive Summary: A total of 1,727 general aviation accidents occurred
during calendar year 2001, involving 1,749 aircraft. The total number of
general aviation accidents in 2001 was lower than in 2000, with a 6%
decrease of 110 accidents. Of the total number of accidents, 325 were fatal,
resulting in a total of 562 fatalities. The number of fatal general aviation
accidents in 2001 decreased 6% from calendar year 2000, and the total number
of fatalities that resulted also decreased by 6%. The circumstances of these
accidents and details related to the aircraft, pilots, and locations are
presented throughout this review.


Also, on the following site is the text below:
http://www.ntsb.gov/pressrel/2006/060317.htm

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: March 17, 2006 SB-06-14
NTSB REPORTS INCREASE IN AVIATION ACCIDENTS IN 2005


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Washington, D.C. - The National Transportation Safety Board today released
preliminary statistics for 2005 showing an overall increase in civil
aviation accidents for both scheduled airline and general aviation
operations.

U.S. civil aviation accidents increased from 1,717 in 2004 to 1,779 in 2005.
However, total fatalities decreased from 636 to 600, and most of these
occurred in general aviation and air taxi operations.

"The increase in accidents is disappointing," said NTSB Acting Chairman Mark
Rosenker, "but the decrease in total fatalities is a hopeful sign. Overall,
it is clear that we need to maintain a strong focus on safety in all
segments of the aviation community," he said.

General aviation accidents increased from 1,617 in 2004 to 1,669 in 2005.
Of these, 321 were fatal accidents, up from 314 in 2004. The general
aviation accident rate increased from 6.49 per 100,000 flight hours in 2004
to 6.83 in 2005. The fatal accident rate increased from 1.26 to 1.31. The
number of fatalities rose slightly from 558 to 562.

In 2005, 32 accidents were recorded for Part 121 scheduled airline
operations, including three that resulted in 22 fatalities. In June, the
driver of a mobile belt baggage loader at Washington Reagan National Airport
was fatally injured when the vehicle struck a US Airways Express EMB-170
being prepared for flight. In December, a Southwest Airlines Boeing 737
slid off the runway at Chicago's Midway Airport, went through a barrier
fence and onto a roadway, killing a passenger in a passing automobile. Also
in December, a Chalk's Ocean Airways Grumman G73T experienced an in-flight
breakup shortly after takeoff in Miami, resulting in 20 fatalities.

Air taxi operations reported 66 accidents in 2005, the same number as
reported in 2004. The accident rate for this category showed a slight
decrease from 2.04 per 100,000 flight hours in 2004 to 2.02 in 2005, with
fatalities dropping markedly from 64 in 2004 to 18 in 2005.

Tables 1-12 providing additional statistics are available at:
http://www.ntsb.gov/aviation/Stats.htm.


NTSB Media Contact:
Paul Schlamm
(202) 314-6100




NTSB Home | News & Events

"Stefan" wrote in message
...
Thomas Borchert schrieb:

What I really did was ask Mr. Rubble to explain how much of a "part of
the equation the reliability of piston engines" really is - after he
stated it was.


I've read this very question over and over from you. At some point, I said
to myself why doesn't this guy just look up the answer?

BTW: According to the BFU Bulletin, in January 2006 it was 75% of the
reported accidents/incidents/whatever in Germany (counting only the light
SEPs).

Oh, and BTW(2): I had one incident when the tug lost its power just after
being airborne while I was in the glider behind. Believe me or not, at
that moment, I wasn't interested the least bit in statistics. I survived
and so did the glider I flew, but it was, well, a moment to remember.

Stefan



  #5  
Old July 27th 06, 08:32 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default Safety of GA flying

Stefan,

BTW: According to the BFU Bulletin, in January 2006 it was 75% of the
reported accidents/incidents/whatever in Germany (counting only the
light SEPs).


Hmm. That seems unusually high.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #6  
Old July 27th 06, 06:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default Safety of GA flying

Thomas Borchert schrieb:

BTW: According to the BFU Bulletin, in January 2006 it was 75% of the
reported accidents/incidents/whatever in Germany (counting only the
light SEPs).


Hmm. That seems unusually high.


But unluckily it is very usual that once more you haven't grasped my
sense of humour. I thought you knew how to read a one-sample-statistic.
And I thought you'd find out that I chose the example carefully.

(Nonetheless, read those Bulletins, you'll be surprized how common
engine failures are.)

Stefan
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air Force Aerial Refueling Methods: Flying Boom versus Hose-and-Drogue Mike Naval Aviation 26 July 11th 06 11:38 PM
ADV: Mountain flying & instruction: Idaho, Colorado, Utah! [email protected] Piloting 0 April 14th 06 05:02 PM
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
FLYING magazine safety article Bob Korves Soaring 27 June 30th 05 01:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.