![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok, what do the numbers mean? I've heard of a "thirty ought six" referring to a gun, and think I know one of them (.30 inches?) refers to the gauge (width of the bullet). What's the other?
The year, 1906. Interesting. Can you name any other bullets with this name format that are as well known as the thirty ought six? What's so special about this one? Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It was the official cartridge of the US military and tens of
thousands of surplus military rifles were sold and millions of commercial rifles world-wide in the same caliber [European call it the 7.62x63] Military designations are often simple, to a supply officer in procurement. Every nation had its own system and commercial makers would alter names so they could be copyrighted. So the 7.62x51 NATO was released by Winchester as the .308 Winchester. The Krag rifle which was adopted in the late 1890 period used smokeless powder and the old black powder designation system... .30-40-220 Krag 30 caliber, 40 grains of powder and a 220 grain bullet. Just after the Civil War the Army adopted the 1873 Springfield rifle in caliber .45-70-405 which was a 45 caliber bullet weighing 405 grain [almost a full ounce of lead] and 70 grains of black powder. The .38 Special uses a 35 caliber bullet and the 44 Special and Magnum use a 43 caliber bullet. The need to have a unique name is often more important than precise accuracy. Some cartridges are named according to the bullet diameter and some according to the bore diameter not counting the depth of the rifling grooves. A .270 uses .277 bullets and might be called 6.8 mm. The 5.56x45 is the 5.56 NATO or the commercial .223 Remington and is chambered in the M16, Ruger Mini-14 and a lot of other rifles and some handguns. Of hand I can't think of any other cartridge that uses a date, but there probably is more than one. You can look up just about every cartridge in a book from Gun Digest CARTRIDGES of the WORLD. -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Jose" wrote in message . .. | Ok, what do the numbers mean? I've heard of a "thirty ought six" referring to a gun, and think I know one of them (.30 inches?) refers to the gauge (width of the bullet). What's the other? | | The year, 1906. | | Interesting. Can you name any other bullets with this name format that | are as well known as the thirty ought six? What's so special about this | one? | | Jose | -- | The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. | for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
Ok, what do the numbers mean? I've heard of a "thirty ought six" referring to a gun, and think I know one of them (.30 inches?) refers to the gauge (width of the bullet). What's the other? The year, 1906. Interesting. Can you name any other bullets with this name format that are as well known as the thirty ought six? What's so special about this one? To be correct, it is a cartridge, not a bullet. No, I know of no others this famous with this name convention. The main thing that is special is that the government used it so widely for so long and it was a pretty versatile round for hunting as well. Large enough for all but the nastiest game on most continents, yet small enough to be shot comfortably by almost anyone. Matt |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:30:35 GMT, Matt Whiting
wrote: Large enough for all but the nastiest game on most continents, yet small enough to be shot comfortably by almost anyone. My next door neighbor asked me today if I wanted some 30-06 shells since he doesn't own one anymore and doesn't hut... I thought for a second and realized that it was one caliber that for whatever reason, I don't own anymore... Come to think of it, I'm not sure if I ever owned one... Owned a .308 at one time, but I can't remember ever owning a 30-06... If I did, it was so many years ago that I've forgotten abou it... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Grumman-581 wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:30:35 GMT, Matt Whiting wrote: Large enough for all but the nastiest game on most continents, yet small enough to be shot comfortably by almost anyone. My next door neighbor asked me today if I wanted some 30-06 shells since he doesn't own one anymore and doesn't hut... I thought for a second and realized that it was one caliber that for whatever reason, I don't own anymore... Come to think of it, I'm not sure if I ever owned one... Owned a .308 at one time, but I can't remember ever owning a 30-06... If I did, it was so many years ago that I've forgotten abou it... I never owned one either. I bought a 7mm Magnum when I was 14 and never looked back. Nothing against the '06, I just liked the 7mm ... and still have that rifle 30 some years later and like it just as much now as then. It is a one-shot kill no matter what I shoot with it. I used it on woodchucks for years, but finally bought a .220 Swift a few years ago as the 7mm is a little heavy for chucks. Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
God Honest | Naval Aviation | 2 | July 24th 03 04:45 AM |