Agricultural UAV

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:56:04 GMT, Jose
wrote in ::

If the operator has a midair, he gets a reprimand.

Under what regulation is a reprimand mandated?

None. I presume that whoever owns the UAV would be upset with its loss,
and will communicate that upsettedness to the operator.


So, while it appears that NavCanada has given the little UAV it's
blessing to operate below 2,200', there are no regulations governing
the competence of its operators. That should change.

If the operator has a midair, he gets a reprimand.
Under what regulation is a reprimand mandated?
None. I presume that whoever owns the UAV would be upset with its loss,
and will communicate that upsettedness to the operator.
So, while it appears that NavCanada has given the little UAV it's
blessing to operate below 2,200', there are no regulations governing
the competence of its operators. That should change.

Ok, perhaps I should say "none that I know of". One should not infer
from my comments that there are no rules in place. However, I infer
from other's comments that the rules so far presented to me are
insufficient.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.