A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Weight-based User Fee Might Incentivize Smaller Planes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 30th 06, 01:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
.Blueskies.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 249
Default Weight-based User Fee Might Incentivize Smaller Planes


"Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:Gq1zg.84634$ZW3.44653@dukeread04...
: ATC exists because it is a military service, it is just
: available to the few thousand airline aircraft and in most
: cases it is forced upon general aviation.
:
:
: --
: James H. Macklin
: ATP,CFI,A&P
:

A bit like NASA and the space shuttle...


  #2  
Old July 30th 06, 02:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Weight-based User Fee Might Incentivize Smaller Planes

The Air Force radar is aimed out over the oceans, the FAA
radar is used to detect and vector traffic within the
boarders. If there is a national emergency [say nuclear
war] the FAA centers will stay in operation for the military
and all other airplanes will be grounded. The
communications system was built to do this and survive a
nuke attack. To justify the costs, it was used to control
more and more general aviation aircraft by the simple tool,
restrict more airspace to aircraft that don't participate.

It isn't all bad or a waste, but a lot of the expense of
owning an airplane is transponders, ELTs [a Congressman's
plane was lost in Colorado and Congress passed a law, not
the FAA], positive control [Class A and B], encoders above
10,000, everything is small potatoes to the government, but
it costs a lot of money to comply with all the rules and
then to maintain the equipment.


".Blueskies." wrote in
message
. net...
|
| "Jim Macklin" wrote
in message news:Gq1zg.84634$ZW3.44653@dukeread04...
| : ATC exists because it is a military service, it is just
| : available to the few thousand airline aircraft and in
most
| : cases it is forced upon general aviation.
| :
| :
| : --
| : James H. Macklin
| : ATP,CFI,A&P
| :
|
| A bit like NASA and the space shuttle...
|
|


  #3  
Old July 30th 06, 04:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default Weight-based User Fee Might Incentivize Smaller Planes

In article 0Z2zg.84638$ZW3.70789@dukeread04,
"Jim Macklin" wrote:

The Air Force radar is aimed out over the oceans,


That's the long range air defense radars.

The USAF operates a number of RAPCONs with terminal
radars


|

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #4  
Old July 30th 06, 05:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Weight-based User Fee Might Incentivize Smaller Planes

True, generally in areas not served by airlines at the time
the facility was built. Military radar is mostly used for
continental defense, with some ATC functions, as you fly
through their airspace, FAA TC will hand you off.

But the entire FAA ATC system is part of the national
defense, just as the Interstate Highway system was created
by Ike as the National Defense Highway System.



"Bob Noel" wrote in
message
...
| In article 0Z2zg.84638$ZW3.70789@dukeread04,
| "Jim Macklin"
wrote:
|
| The Air Force radar is aimed out over the oceans,
|
| That's the long range air defense radars.
|
| The USAF operates a number of RAPCONs with terminal
| radars
|
|
| |
|
| --
| Bob Noel
| Looking for a sig the
| lawyers will hate
|


  #5  
Old July 30th 06, 11:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default Weight-based User Fee Might Incentivize Smaller Planes

In article um5zg.84646$ZW3.18301@dukeread04,
"Jim Macklin" wrote:

True, generally in areas not served by airlines at the time
the facility was built. Military radar is mostly used for
continental defense, with some ATC functions, as you fly
through their airspace, FAA TC will hand you off.


actually some of the military radars are exactly the same
as radars used by the FAA. In fact, the DASR is the
DoD name for the new ASR-11. The DoD is buying some
and the FAA is buying some (albeit way more than the DoD).

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #6  
Old July 31st 06, 03:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Barrow[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 53
Default Weight-based User Fee Might Incentivize Smaller Planes


"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
news:um5zg.84646$ZW3.18301@dukeread04...
True, generally in areas not served by airlines at the time
the facility was built. Military radar is mostly used for
continental defense, with some ATC functions, as you fly
through their airspace, FAA TC will hand you off.


Quite so!

Rapid City's approach control is handled by Ellsworth AFB on the north side
of town.


--
Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO (MTJ)


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder John Doe Piloting 145 March 31st 06 06:58 PM
Should a W&B list gross weight? Andrew Gideon Owning 24 October 21st 05 11:03 PM
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM
more radial fans like fw190? jt Military Aviation 51 August 28th 04 04:22 AM
RV-7a baggage area David Smith Home Built 32 December 15th 03 04:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.