![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 13:11:22 -0500, "Jim Macklin"
wrote: With a few possible exceptions, fighter aircraft radar is two types, a search and a fire control radar. Actually that's only one weapon system radar. The radar searches, if necessary a target is designated and data is fed to weapons, and if necessary the radar is focussed on a sub-set of the entire scan envelope to track the target. Some systems allow for multiple track, some for continuous scanning while simultaneously tracking, some hand-off to autonomous weapons which don't need updates from the launch platform. Both have a fairly small cone in which to detect a target. Well, if you call 45-60 degrees left and right of center and multiple bar width scan a small cone, I guess you're right. But if we are discussing clearing your own flight path, the scan is very adequate. They depend on being vectored in the general direction of a threat in order to detect a target. Quite simply NO! While GCI vectoring is fine (or AWACS), older systems worked quite nicely with dedicated search sectors for flight members (fighters don't fly alone,) and new systems have data fusion systems that integrate data from multiple sources in the aircraft display. Also, military aircraft have radar detectors that warn the pilot/crew that they are being painted by somebody's radar. RHAW or RWR is not relevant to the discussion of flight path clearance here. It also is dependent upon antennae and programming to detect the appropriate frequency and pulse rates of threat radars for presentation. But it isn't really a system designed for anti-collision use, but to keep from being shot down or to find a target to shoot. Or for navigation or for mutual support or for flight path clearance or for weather avoidance, etc. etc. The F14 even has a telescope to allow visual confirmation of targets that are 100 miles away after the radar has found the target, rules of engagement require visual confirmation. Some F-4E aircraft had TISEO and some F-15s had a system called Eagle Eye (might have had other nomenclature or been updated later) but these weren't reaching out to 100 miles. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" www.thunderchief.org www.thundertales.blogspot.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UBL wants a truce - he's scared of the CIA UAV | John Doe | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 19th 06 08:58 PM |
The kids are scared, was Saddam evacuated | D. Strang | Military Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 10:36 PM |
Scared and trigger-happy | John Galt | Military Aviation | 5 | January 31st 04 12:11 AM |