A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

23 July OSH accident audio



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 31st 06, 03:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default 23 July OSH accident audio

The reason for the closure.
Yeah, but why?


So pilots can evaluate their bag of alternate plans with an eye to which
would be more appropriate.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #2  
Old July 31st 06, 05:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default 23 July OSH accident audio

Jose,

So pilots can evaluate their bag of alternate plans with an eye to which
would be more appropriate.


Ok, let's assume the controller knows there's an accident AND they have the
time and free mind capacity to say it on the frequency. Then what? For that
info to be useful, you'd have to know how long it's going to take to clear
up. I'd wager the controllers did not know that.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #3  
Old July 31st 06, 05:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default 23 July OSH accident audio

Ok, let's assume the controller knows there's an accident AND they have the
time and free mind capacity to say it on the frequency. Then what? For that
info to be useful, you'd have to know how long it's going to take to clear
up. I'd wager the controllers did not know that.


No, but now the pilots, knowing more than before, can make their own
evalutions.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #4  
Old August 1st 06, 09:13 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default 23 July OSH accident audio

Jose,

No, but now the pilots, knowing more than before, can make their own
evalutions.


How? What changes in your evaluation from "hold there" to "hold there
because of an accident"?

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #5  
Old August 1st 06, 12:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default 23 July OSH accident audio


"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
...

How? What changes in your evaluation from "hold there" to "hold there
because of an accident"?


"Hold there because of an accident" provides an idea of how long the delay
will be, "hold there" does not.




  #6  
Old August 1st 06, 03:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default 23 July OSH accident audio

Steven,

"Hold there because of an accident" provides an idea of how long the delay
will be


How long will it be? I seriously want to know.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #7  
Old August 1st 06, 04:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 407
Default 23 July OSH accident audio

How long will it be? I seriously want to know.

Minimum for a collapsed gear, 30 minutes, fatal acciden t60 - 90 minutes,
would be close.
--
Jim in NC

  #8  
Old August 1st 06, 04:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default 23 July OSH accident audio


"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
...

Steven,

"Hold there because of an accident" provides an idea of how long the
delay
will be


How long will it be? I seriously want to know.


One hour minimum.


  #9  
Old August 1st 06, 02:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default 23 July OSH accident audio

How? What changes in your evaluation from "hold there" to "hold there
because of an accident"?


Each pilot will make their own determination. What changes in =my= view
is that after an accident, there would likely be cleanup and
investigation, and the runway may be closed for a long time. I would
probably choose to divert if a circuit or two doesn't clear it up.
Other reasons for holds are more ephemeral.

It is true, I could make the wrong decision, but it would be =my=
decision. I value that.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #10  
Old August 1st 06, 04:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Burns[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 329
Default 23 July OSH accident audio

Well said, and it has an added plus. The more pilots that take the
"accident announcement" to mean that the hold will be longer than they are
comfortable with, the more pilots that may leave the congested airspace and
resultantly open up more room and a larger safety factor for not only
themselves, but for those pilots who decide to stay in the hold.

It's a win for those who want to leave, it's a win for those who want to
stay, and it's a win for the controllers.

Jim


"Jose" wrote in message
. ..
How? What changes in your evaluation from "hold there" to "hold there
because of an accident"?


Each pilot will make their own determination. What changes in =my= view
is that after an accident, there would likely be cleanup and
investigation, and the runway may be closed for a long time. I would
probably choose to divert if a circuit or two doesn't clear it up.
Other reasons for holds are more ephemeral.

It is true, I could make the wrong decision, but it would be =my=
decision. I value that.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! Eliot Coweye Home Built 237 February 13th 06 03:55 AM
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Nearly had my life terminated today Michelle P Piloting 11 September 3rd 05 02:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.