![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blueskies.,
Honda jet and Cessna... Cessan vaporware, that is. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas Borchert" wrote: Honda jet and Cessna... Cessan vaporware, that is. Two flying prototypes...vaporware? -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Thomas Borchert" wrote: Honda jet and Cessna... Cessan vaporware, that is. Two flying prototypes...vaporware? Yeah, not what I would consider vaporware, either. -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan,
Two flying prototypes...vaporware? Proof of concept, not prototypes. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Dan, Two flying prototypes...vaporware? Proof of concept, not prototypes. No, they are prototypes. The concept of light jets was proven decades ago so Honda isn't proving any concept with their Jet. Likewise, composite light planes are a proven concept as well so neither is Cessna proving any concept. I'll bet if they move to production the production versions will look a lot like these prototypes, thus confirming that they are prototypes. Matt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... Thomas Borchert wrote: Dan, Two flying prototypes...vaporware? Proof of concept, not prototypes. No, they are prototypes. The concept of light jets was proven decades ago so Honda isn't proving any concept with their Jet. Likewise, composite light planes are a proven concept as well so neither is Cessna proving any concept. I'll bet if they move to production the production versions will look a lot like these prototypes, thus confirming that they are prototypes. Matt I am guessing that for tax purposes, calling it a "proof of concept" is better than calling it a "prototype". |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt,
No, they are prototypes. If you want to call them something different than Cessna, do it. Cessna calls them proof of concept. Both of them. And I've seen enough "marketing speak" to have an idea just why they might do that. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
18 Oct 2005 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 19th 05 02:19 AM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |