![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() This has always bugged me about the standard pattern as it was taught to me, especially the bit about first overflying the field, then flying off at least a mile before descending to the 45. Why would you leave the vicinity of a perfectly good airport, especially when your engine is 60 years old? The FAA recommended approach makes perfectly good sense from a collision-avoidance point of view, but it ignores the fact that engines are not immortal. It makes less sense from a collision avoidance point of view. Why would you fly away from the airport into the path that incoming traffic would take? That's just dumb. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
It makes less sense from a collision avoidance point of view. Why would you fly away from the airport into the path that incoming traffic would take? That's just dumb. As an aside I know of at least one pilot that failed his private pilot checkride because he did the a midfield crosswind entry instead of overflying the airport for 2 miles and re-entering on the 45. The DE didn't like the fact that that airport's flight school taught the midfield crosswind entry (mostly due to overlying class Bravo airspace). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Get Rid Of Warbirds At Oshkosh | RST Engineering | Piloting | 131 | August 11th 06 06:00 AM |
Oshkosh Reflections | Jay Honeck | Owning | 44 | August 7th 05 02:31 PM |
Oshkosh Reflections | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 45 | August 7th 05 02:31 PM |
Oshkosh EAA Warbirds ??? | Paul | Restoration | 0 | July 11th 04 04:17 AM |
How I got to Oshkosh (long) | Doug | Owning | 2 | August 18th 03 12:05 AM |