![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:59:33 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote in . net: "Larry Dighera" wrote in message .. . With regard to low-level MTRs, isn't the ceiling 500' AGL to 1,500' AGL? Why not just fly over top of the proposed MTR restricted airspace? If that approach should happen to interfere with navigation, then the pilot would do what he always does to enter R airspace: Contact ATC. I don't see the problem you apparently do. What am I overlooking? That contacting ATC doesn't mean you'll be cleared to enter a Restricted Area. True. Wouldn't you presume, that any denial of access into R airspace would be predicated on the fact that there is training activity occurring with in that R airspace (it's hot)? If so, it probably wouldn't be a good idea to enter that MTR at that time even if it remained joint use. Right? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... True. Wouldn't you presume, that any denial of access into R airspace would be predicated on the fact that there is training activity occurring with in that R airspace (it's hot)? If so, it probably wouldn't be a good idea to enter that MTR at that time even if it remained joint use. Right? Right. Given that one does not need permission to enter when it isn't hot, what was your point? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:01:59 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote in . net: "Larry Dighera" wrote in message .. . True. Wouldn't you presume, that any denial of access into R airspace would be predicated on the fact that there is training activity occurring with in that R airspace (it's hot)? If so, it probably wouldn't be a good idea to enter that MTR at that time even if it remained joint use. Right? Right. Given that one does not need permission to enter when it isn't hot, what was your point? So you're saying ATC doesn't grant permission to enter R airspace, and it is up to the pilot to enter or not based on ATC's information regarding scheduled activity within it? There's no _clearance_ involved then? Given: http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/AIM/Chap3/aim0304.html#3-4-3 Section 4. Special Use Airspace 3-4-3. Restricted Areas Penetration of restricted areas without authorization from the using or controlling agency may be extremely hazardous to the aircraft and its occupants. It would seem that a pilot would require authorization from the controlling agency (usually ATC) if not a clearance. Unfortunately, I don't find 'authorization' contained in the Pilot/Controller Glossary: http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/PCG/A.HTM What form would that authorization take? [Clearance is contained in the Pilot/Controller Glossary: AIR TRAFFIC CLEARANCE- An authorization by air traffic control for the purpose of preventing collision between known aircraft, for an aircraft to proceed under specified traffic conditions within controlled airspace. The pilot-in-command of an aircraft may not deviate from the provisions of a visual flight rules (VFR) or instrument flight rules (IFR) air traffic clearance except in an emergency or unless an amended clearance has been obtained. Additionally, the pilot may request a different clearance from that which has been issued by air traffic control (ATC) if information available to the pilot makes another course of action more practicable or if aircraft equipment limitations or company procedures forbid compliance with the clearance issued. Pilots may also request clarification or amendment, as appropriate, any time a clearance is not fully understood, or considered unacceptable because of safety of flight. Controllers should, in such instances and to the extent of operational practicality and safety, honor the pilot's request. 14 CFR Part 91.3(a) states: "The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft." THE PILOT IS RESPONSIBLE TO REQUEST AN AMENDED CLEARANCE if ATC issues a clearance that would cause a pilot to deviate from a rule or regulation, or in the pilot's opinion, would place the aircraft in jeopardy. It would seem, that a clearance is only applicable in within controlled airspace, of which R airspace may or may not be, right?] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Larry Dighera wrote: So you're saying ATC doesn't grant permission to enter R airspace, and it is up to the pilot to enter or not based on ATC's information regarding scheduled activity within it? There's no _clearance_ involved then? I'm saying ATC doesn't grant permission to enter Restricted Areas when they're not hot. Have you ever asked ATC for permission to enter a Restricred Area you knew to be inactive? If so, why? Given: http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/AIM/Chap3/aim0304.html#3-4-3 Section 4. Special Use Airspace 3-4-3. Restricted Areas Penetration of restricted areas without authorization from the using or controlling agency may be extremely hazardous to the aircraft and its occupants. It would seem that a pilot would require authorization from the controlling agency (usually ATC) if not a clearance. It would seem that paragraph refers to a Restricted Area that is hot. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UBL wants a truce - he's scared of the CIA UAV | John Doe | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 19th 06 08:58 PM |
The kids are scared, was Saddam evacuated | D. Strang | Military Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 10:36 PM |
Scared and trigger-happy | John Galt | Military Aviation | 5 | January 31st 04 12:11 AM |