Leaving the community

Peter Duniho wrote:

But the real issue here is that the people who voted for Bush, on the
whole, simply either refuse to believe the factual reports that
contradict everything Bush claimed and claims, or failed to pay
attention to those reports when they were made.

So, just to confirm, you're saying that anybody voting for Bush failed to
pay attention or chose to ignore "the facts". How do you reconcile that
argument with this statement from the same post?:

I can respect someone that fully understands what Bush did, and still
decides that in the greater scheme of things we're better off with
Bush. That's fine.

If "that's fine", then why can't you just admit that 51% of the voters fully
understood what Bush did and still decided we're better off with him than
Kerry?

Man, talk about sour grapes...

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415
____________________

"John T" wrote in message
m...
So, just to confirm, you're saying that anybody voting for Bush failed to
pay attention or chose to ignore "the facts".

I'm not saying at that all. You need reading lessons, I guess.

If "that's fine", then why can't you just admit that 51% of the voters
fully understood what Bush did and still decided we're better off with
him than Kerry?

Why would I admit something that's not true? 51% did not act as you claim.
Extrapolating from the Gallup data, 18% of the voters fully understood what
Bush did and still decided we're better off with him than Kerry. 33% did
not fully understand what Bush did and yet made the same decision.

Pete

"Peter Duniho" wrote in message


I'm not saying at that all. You need reading lessons, I guess.

Perhaps. Would you kindly parse this for me and let me know what you really
meant, then?:

quote
But the real issue here is that the people who voted for Bush, on the whole,
simply either refuse to believe the factual reports that contradict
everything Bush claimed and claims, or failed to pay attention to those
reports when they were made.
/quote

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415
____________________

But the real issue here is that the people who voted for Bush, on the
whole,
simply either refuse to believe the factual reports that contradict
everything Bush claimed and claims, or failed to pay attention to those
reports when they were made.

If you are talking about the iraq-terrorism connection then you are dead
wrong. Try reading the 911 commission report before making wild claims.

"Greg Butler" wrote in message


But the real issue here is that the people who voted for Bush, on the
whole,
simply either refuse to believe the factual reports that contradict
everything Bush claimed and claims, or failed to pay attention to
those reports when they were made.

If you are talking about the iraq-terrorism connection then you are
dead wrong. Try reading the 911 commission report before making wild
claims.

That was Peter's statement, not mine. I've made no claims one way or
another about Saddam/9-11.

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415
____________________

"John T" wrote in message
That was Peter's statement, not mine. I've made no claims one way or
another about Saddam/9-11.

That was bad quoting on my part. I knew it was his, put it on the wrong
thread I guess.

"John T" wrote in message
m...
Perhaps. Would you kindly parse this for me and let me know what you
really meant, then?

I meant exactly what I wrote. Nowhere in the statement that you quoted is
anything that could be construed as meaning "anybody voting for Bush failed
to pay attention or chose to ignore the facts". As I've stated elsewhere,
some 36% of the people voting for Bush did apparently have the facts.
"Anybody voting for Bush" would imply 0%, and I've not once said that.

Pete