![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michelle" wrote in
Let me answer your question with another question: why do you file all the time (why only IFR) now and not then? I can't answer for Wizard, but he seems to be doing the same thing I did / am doing. If it's severe clear out and I have a one hour flight, either I go IFR or not talk to a soul. Sure things can happen, but if I am enroute to a destination, the person expecting me knows my arrival time and if I don't arrive within a set time I tell them, they know to call FSS. Reason for me going IFR is that I can't be willy nilly dropped from the system, and I have company for the ride. With VFR flight following, it is on a work load basis, and if I was upstairs for a couple of hours, I want to be assured that I don't get dropped from the system. I don't have to worry about airspace issues or cloud clearances. Another reason for not using a VFR flight plan is that once I am on the ground, I am done, no remembering to call flight services, no looking up the local FSS to close my plan and so on and so on. One time before getting my instrument rating, I diverted to another airport which caused all sorts of confusion with FSS. I called in to close my plan, and said I landed at a different airport. Next thing you know, I get a phone call from my destination contact all in a quandry to where am I inspite of me calling them to let them know I was in a different city / state because flight service got things discombobled some how. At least with the IFR plan, I divert to another controlled airport, then my plan is cancelled without adding additional stress of closing a plan. As to your question, it just seems so "unprofessional" and I think unprofessional conduct by pilots is a big part of the reason GA has such a higher accident rate than cars, and private pilots have the highest rates among their pilot brethren. Here's where I respectfully disagree with you. Filing a VFR flight plan does nothing for professionalism. I don't see any difference in me jumping in my Sundowner for a one hour flight down to the coast then me driving in my Dodge Ram one hour to another destination. I am fortunate enough to own my own plane, and I expect each button to turn, twist, pull or push. If I don't have faith in my own equipment, then I shouldn't leave the ground. The professionalism I do see in private pilots is getting a briefing, doing all checklists, flying to point A to B and landing in the same condition they left in. Filing a VFR flight plan does nothing to enhance this. For that matter, filing an IFR flight plan does nothing for professionalism. It's all the presentation. One thing I find inexcuseable is not getting a preflight briefing. The one and only time I did not get a briefing, I suffered the on air embarrasment of being asked if I was aware of a balloon activity notam. All I was doing was going to the practice area. I made myself a promise from that date forward, I will never fly without getting a FSS briefing. It sure is simple enough and I do it on the ride to the airport. Ok, rambled enough, flame away *big smile* Allen |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
DUATS & Canadian Flight Plans | Andrew Sarangan | Piloting | 2 | November 7th 05 08:51 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Third Military-Civil MAC Jan. 18, 2005 | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 37 | February 14th 05 03:21 PM |
Aerial PHotography Flights 'Required' to File Flight Plans | C J Campbell | Piloting | 15 | December 6th 04 02:17 PM |