A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

GPS loss of signal explanation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 5th 06, 01:00 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.owning
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default OT - GPS loss of signal explanation

In article ,
"Peter Duniho" wrote:

In addition to Jon's nice explanation of DME, I'd like to point out that
because DME is an active receive-and-reply system, it can get saturated when
too many aircraft are using the same DME site. A pilot using DME in busy
airspace should keep this in mind, in case some funny numbers start getting
spit out, or the DME just stops giving any indications.

I admit, I've never actually seen this happen, but it is theoretically
possible.


Interesting. I hadn't thought about the interrogator before. But It's more
likely that the ground station will reduce the sensitivity to the point that
it doesn't transmit that many replies - thereby reducing the probability
the DME will be listening to a reply intended for someone else.

For a DME interrogator that already acquired the ground station and
is tracking, it's extremely unlikely that its tracking algorithm will drift
off. Remember that the interrogations are psuedorandom, there are
only 30 interrogations per second (IIRC), and they are short.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #2  
Old August 5th 06, 08:59 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.owning
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 774
Default OT - GPS loss of signal explanation

"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
Interesting. I hadn't thought about the interrogator before. But It's
more
likely that the ground station will reduce the sensitivity to the point
that
it doesn't transmit that many replies - thereby reducing the probability
the DME will be listening to a reply intended for someone else.


That would cause the DME in the airplane to stop providing DME information,
which is one of the consequences I mentioned. I admit, I wasn't precise
about which "DME" would stop giving nay indications...it's the one in the
airplane I was talking about.

For a DME interrogator that already acquired the ground station and
is tracking, it's extremely unlikely that its tracking algorithm will
drift
off. Remember that the interrogations are psuedorandom, there are
only 30 interrogations per second (IIRC), and they are short.


I agree it's less likely you'll get erroneous data from the DME. It'd be a
pretty rare situation in which that happens, assuming it has ever happened
at all anywhere. My main point is just that pilots should be aware of the
limitations of DME (I guess we could mention slant-range here too, but I
think we were just talking about the radio signal itself? I've lost track
).

Pete


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! Eliot Coweye Home Built 237 February 13th 06 03:55 AM
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Parachute fails to save SR-22 Capt.Doug Piloting 72 February 10th 05 05:14 AM
Night bombers interception in Western Europe in 1944 Bernardz Military Aviation 205 July 22nd 04 05:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.