![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Martin Hotze" wrote in message
... They are polluting their future generations. unless you don't at least sign the Kyoto treaty and act accordingly you have no say, IMHO. Have you signed the Kyoto treaty? Somehow, I doubt it. So by your own opinion, you have no say. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 02:13:10 -0700, Peter Duniho wrote:
unless you don't at least sign the Kyoto treaty and act accordingly you have no say, IMHO. [2] Have you signed the Kyoto treaty? yes. [1] Somehow, I doubt it. *bah* So by your own opinion, you have no say. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Kyoto_Protocol_signatories there are not so many red spots .... [1] [1] to answer your question: Austria has signed on Sep 24th 1998 and ratified on May 31st 2002. [2] I have to correct myself: you (the USA) have signed, but not ratified: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Protocol#Position_of_the_United_States #m -- Did you ever realize how much text fits in eighty columns? If you now consider that a signature usually consists of up to four lines, this gives you enough space to spread a tremendous amount of information with your messages. So seize this opportunity and don't waste your signature with bull**** nobody will read. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Martin Hotze wrote: On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 02:13:10 -0700, Peter Duniho wrote: unless you don't at least sign the Kyoto treaty and act accordingly you have no say, IMHO. [2] Have you signed the Kyoto treaty? yes. [1] I'm guessing Peter meant you personally signed the treaty. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Martin Hotze" wrote in message
... Have you signed the Kyoto treaty? yes. [1] You answered "yes", but your footnote discusses Austria's signing of the treaty, not your own. I ask again: have YOU signed the Kyoto treaty? [...] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Kyoto_Protocol_signatories there are not so many red spots .... [1] I looked at that list. I didn't see your name on it. In fact, the entire list is of countries, not individual people. So, again, by your own opinion, you have no say. Pete |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 10:07:43 -0700, Peter Duniho wrote:
I ask again: have YOU signed the Kyoto treaty? [...] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Kyoto_Protocol_signatories there are not so many red spots .... [1] I looked at that list. I didn't see your name on it. In fact, the entire list is of countries, not individual people. So, again, by your own opinion, you have no say. Pete *wow* .. stick a finger up your ass! Idiot. Yes, I started calling names. Do whatever you want. EOD. #m, *shakinghead* (fup2poster, you are free to ignore it) -- Did you ever realize how much text fits in eighty columns? If you now consider that a signature usually consists of up to four lines, this gives you enough space to spread a tremendous amount of information with your messages. So seize this opportunity and don't waste your signature with bull**** nobody will read. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Martin Hotze" wrote in message
... *wow* .. stick a finger up your ass! Thanks for the offer, but you can keep your finger to yourself. Idiot. You insist that a person needs to have signed the Kyoto treaty to express an opinion on environmental issues, you haven't signed the treaty yourself in spite of claiming that you have, and *I* am the idiot? I suppose I could interpret your statement to mean that a person's *government* needs to have signed the Kyoto treaty for *that person* to express an opinion on environmental issues, but that's an even more idiotic stance than the one I chose to infer. In what rational world is a person required to agree with their own government, or be limited in their opinions by how their government acts? Still, you fail to surprise. Idiotic claims and opinions, ad hominem attacks, and a complete lack of contribution to the actual *aviation* nature of this newsgroup are pretty much your calling cards. (fup2poster, you are free to ignore it) If you actually believed in following-up to the poster, you'd have sent your flame in email in the first place. But then, I don't suppose I should be surprised by your hypocritical behavior either. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Oshkosh 2003 Redux | Montblack | Owning | 86 | August 14th 03 04:29 PM |
Oshkosh 2003 Redux | Montblack | Piloting | 62 | August 14th 03 04:29 PM |
Oshkosh 2003 Redux | Peter R. | Piloting | 30 | August 8th 03 11:41 PM |
Oshkosh 2003 Redux | Sydney Hoeltzli | Owning | 2 | August 6th 03 07:27 AM |
Oshkosh 2003 Redux | Sydney Hoeltzli | Piloting | 2 | August 6th 03 07:27 AM |