![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 16:59:21 -0600, Newps wrote:
Larry Dighera wrote: If Mr. Rasimus' assertion, that the flight plan type for the military is IFR is correct, and MTRs are created for military use, why are there VFR MTRs? Presumably the military won't be operating VFR on VFR MTRs. The military often flies on an IFR flight plan and then takes responsibility for its own separation from other military aircraft and the ground. It's really nothing more than flight following. ATC just waits for them to get done playing, get separated and then we take over. However to say they are always IFR is ridiculous. Ya can't fly at 200 agl in yer B52 IFR. Do not confuse IFR--the rules, with IMC--the weather. You can drive yer BUFF along the low level route under visual rules in visual weather--but you departed the home drome on an IFR flight plan and when you complete the route you will resume your IFR flight plan for recovery. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" www.thunderchief.org www.thundertales.blogspot.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UBL wants a truce - he's scared of the CIA UAV | John Doe | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 19th 06 08:58 PM |
The kids are scared, was Saddam evacuated | D. Strang | Military Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 10:36 PM |
Scared and trigger-happy | John Galt | Military Aviation | 5 | January 31st 04 12:11 AM |