A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Leaving the community



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 5th 04, 06:05 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Newps" wrote in message
...
Polls are facts about statistics.


A poll isn't a fact about anything except the people who participated.


The poll itself is a fact about the statistical sample taken. Which is
exactly what I said (though apparently not in a verbose enough way for some
of you).

If you feel you have some good reason to dispite the Gallup poll results,
I'm all ears. If all you can come up with is "well, there's a 0.000000001%
chance that the poll is incorrect", then while that may be perfectly true,
it's a pretty useless statement.

The FACT remains that there's a much larger chance that the poll correctly
describes the overall electorate than that it doesn't.

Pete


  #2  
Old November 5th 04, 12:17 PM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Peter Duniho"
wrote:

The FACT remains that there's a much larger chance that the poll
correctly
describes the overall electorate than that it doesn't.


you have much more faith in polls than I do.

--
Bob Noel
Seen on Kerry's campaign airplane: "the real deal"
oh yeah baby.
  #3  
Old November 5th 04, 01:47 PM
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Newps" wrote in message
...
Polls are facts about statistics.


A poll isn't a fact about anything except the people who participated.


The poll itself is a fact about the statistical sample taken. Which is
exactly what I said (though apparently not in a verbose enough way for

some
of you).

If you feel you have some good reason to dispite the Gallup poll results,
I'm all ears. If all you can come up with is "well, there's a

0.000000001%
chance that the poll is incorrect", then while that may be perfectly true,
it's a pretty useless statement.

The FACT remains that there's a much larger chance that the poll correctly
describes the overall electorate than that it doesn't.


You would be hard pressed to prove that. Polls are at best one step above a
WAG.

Pete




  #4  
Old November 5th 04, 03:38 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Dave Stadt wrote:



You would be hard pressed to prove that. Polls are at best one step above a
WAG.


Science proves it. But, everything has to go right for the poll to
achieve that margin of error. First you must get a represenative random
sample. This rarely happens, there's always a little error here.
Second the questions must not be skewed one way or the other. Third,
the people must tell the truth. This also never happens. They always
give the margin of error when you see a poll, this is a theoretical
number that cannot be reached because no poll will ever be truly random,
somebody always lies, or says they're someone their not, etc. One of
the pollsters on TV this week said that to get the 850+ responses for a
+-3% poll they had to call over 10,000 people. With those kinds of
problems no way can a poll be anymore than a guess.
  #5  
Old November 6th 04, 01:31 AM
Klein
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 08:38:26 -0700, Newps wrote:



Dave Stadt wrote:



You would be hard pressed to prove that. Polls are at best one step above a
WAG.


Science proves it. But, everything has to go right for the poll to
achieve that margin of error. First you must get a represenative random
sample. This rarely happens, there's always a little error here.
Second the questions must not be skewed one way or the other. Third,
the people must tell the truth. This also never happens. They always
give the margin of error when you see a poll, this is a theoretical
number that cannot be reached because no poll will ever be truly random,
somebody always lies, or says they're someone their not, etc. One of
the pollsters on TV this week said that to get the 850+ responses for a
+-3% poll they had to call over 10,000 people. With those kinds of
problems no way can a poll be anymore than a guess.


This is really a hoot. We wouldn't be talking about this at all if
the exit polls hadn't been so wrong. There's the proof. As to why
this happened, my theory is that there is a systematic bias error
because people who voted for Bush had better things to do with their
time than talk to the pollster. Same thing with the phone polls,
9,150 people were too busy to talk to the pollster and there is a
bias that affects the results in that.

Klein
  #6  
Old November 5th 04, 03:28 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Peter Duniho wrote:


The FACT remains that there's a much larger chance that the poll correctly
describes the overall electorate than that it doesn't.


This statement is correct. There is a chance the poll represents the
actual fact. Depending on how accurate you want to be you can also say
the poll never correctly describes the actual fact. The poll will
always get you close, how close depends on the sample size. The same
science that tells you how close also tells you it will never be exactly
right.
  #7  
Old November 5th 04, 05:00 PM
Everett M. Greene
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Peter Duniho" writes:
"Newps" wrote:


Polls are facts about statistics.


A poll isn't a fact about anything except the people who participated.


The poll itself is a fact about the statistical sample taken. Which is
exactly what I said (though apparently not in a verbose enough way for some
of you).

If you feel you have some good reason to dispite the Gallup poll results,
I'm all ears. If all you can come up with is "well, there's a 0.000000001%
chance that the poll is incorrect", then while that may be perfectly true,
it's a pretty useless statement.

The FACT remains that there's a much larger chance that the poll correctly
describes the overall electorate than that it doesn't.


My favorite statistics story: I was reading an article about
weather prediction in which NOAA claimed about 75% accuracy
in their predictions. You can say that tomorrow's weather
will be the same as today's and be about 90% accurate in most
parts of the world.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Report Leaving Assigned Altitude? John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 81 March 20th 04 02:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.