A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

CESSNA LSA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 8th 06, 08:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
ET
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 61
Default CESSNA LSA

wrote in :

Montblack wrote:
wrote)
The blurbs I've been reading say if they can't get to the magic
$100K, they aren't going to produce it.



http://skyhawk.cessna.com/pricelist.chtml
Price List: $172,500 - $209,750
Max speed at sea level: 123 kts


Cessna LSA:
"120 kts!"
$100,000(?)
60% the fuel burn of a new 172?


Yeah, but at a much reduced payload.

Check out the Sport Cruiser at http://www.sportaircraftworks.com/


The sport cruiser will only cruise at about 100 knots...

--
-- ET :-)

"A common mistake people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools."---- Douglas Adams
  #2  
Old August 8th 06, 09:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default CESSNA LSA

ET wrote:
wrote in :


Montblack wrote:
wrote)
The blurbs I've been reading say if they can't get to the magic
$100K, they aren't going to produce it.



http://skyhawk.cessna.com/pricelist.chtml
Price List: $172,500 - $209,750
Max speed at sea level: 123 kts


Cessna LSA:
"120 kts!"
$100,000(?)
60% the fuel burn of a new 172?


Yeah, but at a much reduced payload.

Check out the Sport Cruiser at http://www.sportaircraftworks.com/


The sport cruiser will only cruise at about 100 knots...


Yeah, I really meant the parrot which is about 115 knots with 120 hp.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #3  
Old August 8th 06, 10:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default CESSNA LSA


wrote in message
...
ET wrote:
wrote in :


Montblack wrote:
wrote)
The blurbs I've been reading say if they can't get to the magic
$100K, they aren't going to produce it.


http://skyhawk.cessna.com/pricelist.chtml
Price List: $172,500 - $209,750
Max speed at sea level: 123 kts

Cessna LSA:
"120 kts!"
$100,000(?)
60% the fuel burn of a new 172?

Yeah, but at a much reduced payload.

Check out the Sport Cruiser at http://www.sportaircraftworks.com/


The sport cruiser will only cruise at about 100 knots...


Yeah, I really meant the parrot which is about 115 knots with 120 hp.


You know that Sport Cruiser looks like it should be faster than that even
with a 912ULS engine.


  #4  
Old August 8th 06, 10:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
ET
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 61
Default CESSNA LSA

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in
:


wrote in message
...
ET wrote:
wrote in
:


Montblack wrote:
wrote)
The blurbs I've been reading say if they can't get to the magic
$100K, they aren't going to produce it.


http://skyhawk.cessna.com/pricelist.chtml
Price List: $172,500 - $209,750
Max speed at sea level: 123 kts

Cessna LSA:
"120 kts!"
$100,000(?)
60% the fuel burn of a new 172?

Yeah, but at a much reduced payload.

Check out the Sport Cruiser at http://www.sportaircraftworks.com/


The sport cruiser will only cruise at about 100 knots...


Yeah, I really meant the parrot which is about 115 knots with 120 hp.


You know that Sport Cruiser looks like it should be faster than that
even with a 912ULS engine.



The looks are decieving. I was told at OSH by the dealer that the slower
speed has to do some with higher empty weight, although that doesnt make
much sense since it is still slower at the same gross the parrot would
be faster at....

I like the Parrot alot, although I'm ussually partial to low wings, the
Parrot DOES have a stand-up cockpit. I bet the Sport Cruiser would get
up there a bit with the Jabiru engine.



--
-- ET :-)

"A common mistake people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools."---- Douglas Adams
  #6  
Old August 9th 06, 05:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Lyle Cox
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default CESSNA LSA

actually...according to one sport cruiser dealer......the Sport Cruiser is
distributed by the same distributor as teh Sport Sting, which has a much
higher price tag. The distributor, on purpose, de-rates the Cruiser's speed
to improve the sales on the Sting.

I'll let you know. I'm flying a Cruiser next week.


wrote in message
news:Rd8Cg.17729$Qu4.9630@trnddc04...

On 8-Aug-2006, wrote:

Yeah, I really meant the parrot which is about 115 knots with 120 hp.



--If you believe in miracles. By the laws of aerodynamics, for a given
airframe (i.e. same drag characteristics) the airspeed in level flight
will
increase as the cube root of the increase in power. According to the
cited
webpage, the Parrot cruises at 75% with a 100 hp engine at 115 mph (100
kts). They PROJECT that 75% cruise speed will be 130 mph(113 kts) with a
120 hp engine. But according to the cube root law, you would need to
increase engine size to 144 hp in order to get 75% cruise to increase from
115 to 130 mph. In order to do it with only 120 hp you would have to have
a
miraculous increase in propeller efficiency (not likely, and anyway you
can't do better than 100%) and/or a huge reduction in cooling drag (also
unlikely). More likely, 75% cruise with the 120 hp engine will be around
122 mph (106 kts).


-Elliott Drucker



  #7  
Old August 9th 06, 07:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
ET
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 61
Default CESSNA LSA

wrote in
news:Rd8Cg.17729$Qu4.9630@trnddc04:


On 8-Aug-2006,
wrote:

Yeah, I really meant the parrot which is about 115 knots with 120 hp.



--If you believe in miracles. By the laws of aerodynamics, for a
given airframe (i.e. same drag characteristics) the airspeed in level
flight will increase as the cube root of the increase in power.
According to the cited webpage, the Parrot cruises at 75% with a 100
hp engine at 115 mph (100 kts). They PROJECT that 75% cruise speed
will be 130 mph(113 kts) with a 120 hp engine. But according to the
cube root law, you would need to increase engine size to 144 hp in
order to get 75% cruise to increase from 115 to 130 mph. In order to
do it with only 120 hp you would have to have a miraculous increase in
propeller efficiency (not likely, and anyway you can't do better than
100%) and/or a huge reduction in cooling drag (also unlikely). More
likely, 75% cruise with the 120 hp engine will be around 122 mph (106
kts).


-Elliott Drucker


It could also be the efficiency of the "100 hp" Rotax comparted to the
120hp Jabiru. Cooling drag WILL come into effect as the Rotax is water
cooled and generally not well baffled in the engine compartment except
for the radiator.

Also for some reason they want to put a 3 blade propeller on these Rotax
LSAs, and I mostly see 2 bladed props on Jabirus.

Maybe wont make up the whole difference, but time will tell I suppose.

--
-- ET :-)

"A common mistake people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools."---- Douglas Adams
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1/72 Cessna 300, 400 series scale models Ale Owning 3 October 22nd 13 03:40 PM
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
Nearly had my life terminated today Michelle P Piloting 11 September 3rd 05 02:37 AM
Wow - heard on the air... (long) Nathan Young Piloting 68 July 25th 05 06:51 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.