![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
NEVER EVER vote against a candidate! If you are voting against one
person that means you are assuming the person whose name you select will be better without actually knowing. If you get to a fork in the road and one way gets to where you want to go but is gravel rutted out and pot marked with large puddles while the other way is paved and looks like a pretty decent road but you have no idea where it leads, which way do you take knowing once you decide, you can not turn back? It always bothers me when someone says they voted against someone because that tells me they don't really know who they voted for. All they know is that they don't like one candidate. Now if you get to a fork in the road and decide you know you don't want to go where one road leads and have no idea where the other leads, then maybe you should have stopped and asked for directions. More people really need to vote in the primaries. Bob Chilcoat wrote: I absolutely agree with you, Jay. Yet again, I had to vote AGAINST a candidate, rather than FOR one. I just thought Kerry was the least-bad candidate. When Bush opens his mouth, or just looks at the camera, for that matter, the back of my hair goes up. What thinking individual could vote FOR this idiot. I guess my version of the least-bad candidate was the same as only 49.9% of the rest of the country. Apparently you can fool 50% of the people, but there is always a noise function. -- Bob (Chief Pilot, White Knuckle Airways) I don't have to like Bush and Cheney (Or Kerry, for that matter) to love America "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:k_bid.351511$MQ5.252777@attbi_s52... These people are mad Kerry didn't run a liberal campaign and can't stand that he "was just as pro-war as Bush." That is SO ironic. If the Democrats has nominated a middle-of-the-road guy to run against Bush -- say, Dick Gephardt -- this election would not have even been close. The Democrats would have swept the nation, and never by less than 25 percentage points. Stupidly, they nominated a guy whose political positions were to the left of Ted Kennedy's, absolutely ensuring a Bush victory. There were many traditional Republicans out here -- myself included -- who would have voted for a conservative Democrat in this election. But there was just no way for any of us to vote for a guy like Kerry. The moral for the Democrats: Don't ever nominate an ultra liberal to run for president again. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Report Leaving Assigned Altitude? | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 81 | March 20th 04 02:34 PM |