![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
... ... It seemed to me that I could probably fly between or above the layers en-route, but I was worried about the possibility of having to descend through two layers of wet (and possibly icy) clouds and maybe have to do an approach to minimums in very gusty winds. Sometimes you can avoid ice in the air with ease. And sometimes you can't. So unless you like Russian Roulette, you need to have a plan B. And plan B may be having warm air below you at a safe altitude, or it may be the knowledge that you've got ice-free conditions behind you. In the conditions you describe, my first concern would be whether there were safe levels at the destination below the ice, in particular in case I missed the approach. If that were the case, I wouldn't be particularly concerned with the descent through icing levels, as I'd have safe haven below. Enroute, I'd want either a safe level below the ice or the knowledge that I could avoid icing conditions by choice of level or by lateral avoidance of isolated or scattered Cu. In order to check that those conditions would exist, I'd want a similar "safe haven" at the point of departure. It goes without saying that you made the right call. Julian Scarfe |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
It's all about the credibility you don't have, ChuckZZZ | Juan.Jimenez | Home Built | 8 | November 4th 03 01:03 PM |
Oshkosh Roster -- Sign In, Please! | john smith | Home Built | 24 | July 29th 03 02:14 AM |
Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Bruce E. Butts | Home Built | 4 | July 26th 03 11:34 AM |