![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:32:20 -0600, Newps wrote:
Ed Rasimus wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:31:59 -0600, Newps wrote: Ed Rasimus wrote: Trust me, they departed their home station on an IFR flight plan. No, they do not always do this. Can you give me a basis for this assurance? Yeah, they call me up VFR and we sequence them into the pattern. What's so hard to understand? Does "call me up VFR" and "departed their home station on an IFR flight plan" indicate some sort of incompatibility? My statement remains, that virtually ALL USAF flights in the US operate on an IFR flight plan remains. They depart IFR, they either terminate the IFR (always an option) or take an enroute delay for training, then when they recover they resume IFR. You have not indicated anything in conflict with what I stated. Sorry, no. Yep, your right. I can't tell the difference between IFR and VFR. You talk about VFR at your location for a flight already airborne that neither originated or recovered there. Do you understand that a flight can be on an IFR flight plan and still operate for a period VFR? Go to any military base and you'll find local operating procedures that specify departures from the base and recoveries. I don't work at a military base. That isn't the point here, is it? You are challenging my statement that virtually all USAF military flights originate on an IFR flight plan. Where you work doesn't make much difference to that, except that it might indicate your lack of exposure to the facts in the issue. Those procedures are designed with ATC coordination and proceed from fix to fix along a specified route of flight. This routing allows for unimpeded operation whether the current weather is IMC or VMC. Anything else would be unworkable. Sounds reasonable at busy places. Does not apply here. Who cares what applies "here"? Again, if you've got some direct experience in this area beyond opinion gleaned from watching pop-up traffic at your station, I'm willing to listen. I've already posted my experience. Which doesn't qualify you for more than an opinion. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" www.thunderchief.org www.thundertales.blogspot.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
they either terminate the IFR
(always an option) After they "terminate the IFR", are they no longer "on an IFR flight plan"? You stated that they are always "on an IFR flight plan". Certainly (and more to the point) they are no longer on an ATC clearance. -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UBL wants a truce - he's scared of the CIA UAV | John Doe | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 19th 06 08:58 PM |
The kids are scared, was Saddam evacuated | D. Strang | Military Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 10:36 PM |
Scared and trigger-happy | John Galt | Military Aviation | 5 | January 31st 04 12:11 AM |