Approach Questions

A fan marker lights the white light. An OM lights the blue light.

Andrew Sarangan wrote:

A few questions came up in ground school that had me stumped. Any insight
is appreciated.

Why do some approaches say Radar required when all the fixes can be
identified using other equipment required for the approach? For example,
VOR-DME-A at 3G3.

When a holding pattern is published in lieu of a PT, my understanding of
the AIM (5-4-9 (4)) is that you only have to perform the entry, and are not
required to do any laps around the pattern. What if the hold requires a
direct entry? In that case it seems that you can effectively skip the
holdind pattern, which does not make sense to me because a PT (or hold in
lieu of PT) is a required maneuver. Take a look at SDF10 @ DWU.

Why does the hold in lieu of a PT always say "1 min". Isn't a hold always 1
min? Why is this mentioned only for this type of hold, and not mentioned
for all other holds?

What exactly is a Fan Marker? See SDF10 @ DWU. How is this different from
an OM? The fan marker seems to have its own identifier code.

Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

So, you are saying that the FM activate the same light as the Inside
Marker. Is this written down anywhere? I could not find anything in the
AIM. Before I explain this to my ground school I want to be certain I
have the correct answer.



wrote in :

A fan marker lights the white light. An OM lights the blue light.

Andrew Sarangan wrote:

A few questions came up in ground school that had me stumped. Any
insight is appreciated.

Why do some approaches say Radar required when all the fixes can be
identified using other equipment required for the approach? For
example, VOR-DME-A at 3G3.

When a holding pattern is published in lieu of a PT, my understanding
of the AIM (5-4-9 (4)) is that you only have to perform the entry,
and are not required to do any laps around the pattern. What if the
hold requires a direct entry? In that case it seems that you can
effectively skip the holdind pattern, which does not make sense to me
because a PT (or hold in lieu of PT) is a required maneuver. Take a
look at SDF10 @ DWU.

Why does the hold in lieu of a PT always say "1 min". Isn't a hold
always 1 min? Why is this mentioned only for this type of hold, and
not mentioned for all other holds?

What exactly is a Fan Marker? See SDF10 @ DWU. How is this different
from an OM? The fan marker seems to have its own identifier code.

Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com



Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

Inside marker? I think you mean the inner marker. If you want an
authoritative source try the new FAA instrument flying handbook.

Andrew Sarangan wrote:

So, you are saying that the FM activate the same light as the Inside
Marker. Is this written down anywhere? I could not find anything in the
AIM. Before I explain this to my ground school I want to be certain I
have the correct answer.

wrote in :

A fan marker lights the white light. An OM lights the blue light.

Andrew Sarangan wrote:

A few questions came up in ground school that had me stumped. Any
insight is appreciated.

Why do some approaches say Radar required when all the fixes can be
identified using other equipment required for the approach? For
example, VOR-DME-A at 3G3.

When a holding pattern is published in lieu of a PT, my understanding
of the AIM (5-4-9 (4)) is that you only have to perform the entry,
and are not required to do any laps around the pattern. What if the
hold requires a direct entry? In that case it seems that you can
effectively skip the holdind pattern, which does not make sense to me
because a PT (or hold in lieu of PT) is a required maneuver. Take a
look at SDF10 @ DWU.

Why does the hold in lieu of a PT always say "1 min". Isn't a hold
always 1 min? Why is this mentioned only for this type of hold, and
not mentioned for all other holds?

What exactly is a Fan Marker? See SDF10 @ DWU. How is this different
from an OM? The fan marker seems to have its own identifier code.

Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com


Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com