A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How's the Composites holding up?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 13th 06, 09:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 687
Default How's the Composites holding up?


"Jeff" jfranks1971 minus wrote in message
...

"BobR" wrote in message
oups.com...
I would say that the ongoing, expanded use of composites in both the
experimental aircraft field along with production aircraft should
answer any questions. The use of composites in the large commercial
aircraft is increasing an a much faster rate than in the small plane
market although the Cirrus might prove an exception to that fact.



I didn't mean to sound as if I was saying there was anything wrong. I
assumed that newer "versions" of composites and processes had made it much
better and safer. I just wondered if the original composite planes ever
experienced any of the "doom" problems over time....it would appear not

jf

One example is the Glasflugel Libelle first-generation composite sailplane
first sold in the mid 1960's. Most of them are still flying and in
beautiful condition to boot. They sell on the used market for 10,000 to
15,000 Dollars.

A few of the early composite gliders used balsa core sandwich construction.
If the core got wet and fungal rot started, the structure is toast.
Construction techniques switched to closed cell foam core early on so these
are rare.

I understand some current glider construction techniques eliminate the
sandwich and go with solid pre-preg carbon skins. It's posible to eliminate
the spars too and build a wing that is simply a hollow airfoil shaped tube.

Bill Daniels


  #2  
Old August 15th 06, 11:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Wallace Berry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default How's the Composites holding up?

In article ,
"Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:

One example is the Glasflugel Libelle first-generation composite sailplane
first sold in the mid 1960's. Most of them are still flying and in
beautiful condition to boot. They sell on the used market for 10,000 to
15,000 Dollars.



Yep, I own H301 Libelle #19. She's 42 this year. Flew 5 or 6 flights of
200 miles long or more this past spring. About 2500 hours flying time.
I've put about 300 on her in the 5 years I've owned her. Flown through
some hellacious turbulence and some pretty hard cowpasture landings.
She's still smooth and shiny although some small areas of finish are
starting to turn a bit yellow. No structural problems. No AD's on the
composite structure.

The more modern composite birds like the Diamond DA-20 hold up pretty
well even sitting out in the weather for years.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Newbie holding questions JohnK Instrument Flight Rules 106 January 14th 06 09:44 AM
Holding pattern reporting Yossarian Instrument Flight Rules 14 July 4th 05 10:57 AM
Canadian holding procedures Derrick Early Instrument Flight Rules 24 July 22nd 04 04:03 PM
Q about lost comms on weird clearance Paul Tomblin Instrument Flight Rules 34 February 2nd 04 09:11 PM
Defining Composites (long) B Lacovara Soaring 1 September 13th 03 08:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.