![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think someone lost their meds today...
"Newps" wrote in message . .. : Any chance there's a point to this drivel? : : : : : Bret Ludwig wrote: : : : : Introduction - Powerplant Choices : : RV aircraft are designed to use Lycoming aircraft engines. : : The RV-4 and RV-6/6A use 150/160 hp 0-320 or 180 hp 0-360 engines. : The RV-7/7A and RV-8/8A can accommodate O-320, O-360 or angle valve : IO-360 (200 hp) engines. The RV-9/9A is suitable for Lycoming engines : in the 118 hp to 160 hp range. The engine used in the 4-place RV-10 is : the Lycoming IO-540D4A5 rated at 260 hp. Van's recommendation for the 4 : place includes any of the parallel valve 540's which are available from : 235hp on up to the 260hp version. These engines are the most readily : available, affordable, and reliable of the possible choices. Other : aircraft engines of similar configuration, weight and power might : possibly be used, but only the Lycoming will fit the mounts and cowls : supplied with our kits. : : Van's volume allows us to buy appropriate models of new engines at : O.E.M. (Original Equipment Manufacturer) prices direct from Lycoming. : We market these engines to our customers at far less than list price. : This makes them an affordable alternative, even when compared to the : traditional used engine. Van's has similar arrangements with Hartzell : Propeller, Sensenich Propeller and other manufacturers. : Other Engines : : We are often asked about using non-aircraft engine conversions. We'd : like to pass along a quote from a colleague in the homebuilt airplane : business: : "the best conversion I know is to take $8000 and convert it into a : good used Lycoming." This may sound a bit narrow-minded, but it : reflects the basic truth: no non-aircraft engine has yet proven to be : as reliable, available, and inexpensive (everything considered) as a : traditional aircraft engine. : : It seems that magazines are always printing stories about automobile : engines bought for junkyard prices, mated to inexpensive reduction : drives and flown off into the sunset. It simply doesn't work like : that in the real world. The reliability we have come to expect from : aircraft engines is the result of years of development and refinement : of engines designed specifically for the task. Automobile engines : function well in their intended application: delivering low cruising : power in vehicles with well designed transmissions and power trains. : Using them successfully in an airplane requires continuous high power : outputs and reduction systems coupled to the propeller. This is : completely foreign to their design intent. (You can imagine the car : engine designer banging his head slowly against his desk..."no, no, no. : If I'd known you wanted to do that with it, I would have designed : something different....) : : (Why are Lycomings never found in boats, fire pumps, gensets or other : high output and often life-critical applications? They are less : reliable intrinsically than commodity powerplants, and secondarily : ridiculously priced.) : : With enough research and development effort, auto engines may be made : to work acceptably or even well in an airplane. We are not opposed, in : principle, to RV builders using alternate engines, but we would hope : that this choice is made on facts, not hopes or dreams. Do you want to : spend your time and effort on engine development or do you want to fly : confidently behind an engine that has already been developed? : : (Using that logic why should I spend more money to build your : noncertified, and presumably intrinsically uncertificatable by design, : airframe when less will buy me a PROVEN, certificated aircraft? ) : : : We, too, would like to see "something better" in available powerplants. : We are carefully watching some alternatives. Meanwhile, the proven : Lycomings do the job very well and are the best "available now" option. : Despite the many claims and promises made by promoters, we feel that if : you will look closely at what is actually available, how many are : really flying, and how well they really perform, you will agree with : our conclusions. : : (Not "you may" agree, "YOU WILL". Ja wohl Mein Führer! With all due : disrespect, Dick, I don't think you really would like to see any other : powerplant succeed because one, you have a sweetheart deal with : Lycoming, and two, you want your RVs to be alike as production aircraft : to fluff resale and insurability without the bother of type : certification and production. This is called "the tragedy of the : commons" or "why buy the cow if all those heifers will come to you for : you to milk the living daylights out of and they will buy you breakfast : too".) : : While we are not opposed to RV builders installing alternate engines, : we simply cannot recommend or encourage the installation of any other : engine - we don't feel it would best serve the interest or safety of : the builder. : : (It wouldn't serve OUR interest.) : |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Zodiac XL vs Rans S-19 vs Van's RV-12 | Jim Logajan | Home Built | 12 | July 2nd 06 10:31 PM |
Very Nice Van's RV-6A For Sale | Don | Aviation Marketplace | 3 | January 14th 06 12:13 AM |
Very Nice Van's RV-6A For Sale | Don | General Aviation | 1 | December 21st 05 01:52 AM |
Vans RV-11 | Scott Correa | Soaring | 27 | January 5th 04 07:56 AM |
bulding a kitplane maybe Van's RV9A --- a good idea ????? | Flightdeck | Home Built | 10 | September 9th 03 07:20 PM |