![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... This is hilarious. Do you think that people who voted for Kerry had their facts any more straight? Yes. The Gallup poll shows that to be the case, at least with respect to Bush's statements. It would have been interesting if the Gallup poll would have asked Kerry's supporters whether Bush really had a secret plan to introduce the draft, or whether Bush lost those explosives, or whether Bush had a secret plan to get rid of Social Security, or whether Bush was behind a secret conspiracy to create a flu vaccine shortage. The Gallup poll only addressed Republican myths. If it had asked about Democratic myths it might perhaps have been considerably more balanced in its result. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"C J Campbell" wrote in message
... It would have been interesting if the Gallup poll would have asked Kerry's supporters whether Bush really had a secret plan to introduce the draft, or whether Bush lost those explosives, or whether Bush had a secret plan to get rid of Social Security, or whether Bush was behind a secret conspiracy to create a flu vaccine shortage. Absolutely, it would have been interesting. Some of your examples are extreme, and I doubt significant numbers would have affirmed those examples. But surely it would have turned up a similar lack of knowledge of the actual facts. The Gallup poll only addressed Republican myths. If it had asked about Democratic myths it might perhaps have been considerably more balanced in its result. I guess that depends on what information you're interested. But none of your alternative examples seem nearly as important as the question of whether a sitting President lied about what he knew, in order to win approval for a war that wound up miring us in a huge stinking pile of doo, and then continued to lie about what he said straight through the election. My main point was simply that the electorate in general believes what they want to believe, regardless of what the actual truth is. This is true of all people, regardless of party affiliation. My secondary, much less important point (especially now that the election is over), might be that I personally feel that lying to the public in order to justify a deadly war is a much bigger transgression than has been witnessed in the Executive branch since the Iran-Contra scandal. Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Duniho wrote:
snip My main point was simply that the electorate in general believes what they want to believe, regardless of what the actual truth is. This is true of all people, regardless of party affiliation. My secondary, much less important point (especially now that the election is over), might be that I personally feel that lying to the public in order to justify a deadly war is a much bigger transgression than has been witnessed in the Executive branch since the Iran-Contra scandal. Pete Very well put Pete. I'd add that even if the Iraq invasion was justified it was bungled badly. The administration ignored its own experts and we lost lives because of it. For that reason alone they don't merit being returned to office. -- Frank....H |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Report Leaving Assigned Altitude? | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 81 | March 20th 04 02:34 PM |