Leaving the community

"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Greg Butler" wrote in message
. ..
[...] most Bush voters, however, look at the data first, then make up
their minds.

Which Bush voters? The 64% that still believe that Saddam Hussein was
involved in the 9/11 attacks?

What percentage of Kerry voters still believe that Bush has a secret plan
for the draft? Oh, wait. I guess Gallup did not want to ask questions that
would make Democrats uncomfortable.

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
What percentage of Kerry voters still believe that Bush has a secret plan
for the draft?

Welcome back CJ. You are just as unable to comprehend a point as ever.

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Greg Butler" wrote in message
. ..
[...] most Bush voters, however, look at the data first, then make up
their minds.

Which Bush voters? The 64% that still believe that Saddam Hussein was
involved in the 9/11 attacks?

Indirectly, he was.

How many of the looney left still can't comprehend that we're engaged in a
war on TERRORIDM, not just on the participants of 9/11?

Christ, we couldn't trust the left to run a lemonade stand, much less some
serious business.


What percentage of Kerry voters still believe that Bush has a secret plan
for the draft? Oh, wait. I guess Gallup did not want to ask questions that
would make Democrats uncomfortable.

How many still buy the notion that the peace and prosperity of the 90's was
Bubba's doing?

(Think: Reagan doctrine, and Y2K run-up)

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...
Which Bush voters? The 64% that still believe that Saddam Hussein was
involved in the 9/11 attacks?

Indirectly, he was.

Indirectly, YOU are.

But we're not talking about "indirect involvement" here.

How many of the looney left still can't comprehend that we're engaged in a
war on TERRORIDM, not just on the participants of 9/11?

"TERRORIDM"? Uh, okay. If you say so. And yet, that still doesn't explain
what we're doing in Iraq, there having been no proven connection between
terrorism and Iraq.

Pete

Peter Duniho wrote:

what we're doing in Iraq, there having been no proven connection between
terrorism and Iraq.

Yes, there is. I'd surely call disregarding international law, attacking
and invading a country without a reason and killing thousands of
innocent civilians terrorism. No, wait, there's something wrong here...

Stefan

"Stefan" wrote in message
...
what we're doing in Iraq, there having been no proven connection between
terrorism and Iraq.

Yes, there is. I'd surely call disregarding international law, attacking
and invading a country without a reason and killing thousands of innocent
civilians terrorism.

Yeah, sorry...I should have been more specific. "No proven connection prior
to our invasion of Iraq between terrorism by Islamic radicals and Iraq".

No, wait, there's something wrong here...

Yes, there is.

"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Stefan" wrote in message
...
what we're doing in Iraq, there having been no proven connection
between
terrorism and Iraq.

Yes, there is. I'd surely call disregarding international law, attacking
and invading a country without a reason and killing thousands of
innocent
civilians terrorism.

Yeah, sorry...I should have been more specific. "No proven connection
prior
to our invasion of Iraq between terrorism by Islamic radicals and Iraq".


Well yes, actually, there was a proven connection even during Clinton's
time. Saddam regularly paid bounties to the families of suicide bombers for
Hamas and offered rewards for anyone who would kill Americans.

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
Well yes, actually, there was a proven connection even during Clinton's
time. Saddam regularly paid bounties to the families of suicide bombers
for
Hamas and offered rewards for anyone who would kill Americans.

Ahh, right. The Hamas. Remind me again...they were the ones that planned
the 9/11 attacks then? Oh, no...it wasn't them, was it?

I'm still waiting for the "connection" that explains why we're in Iraq now.

"Stefan" wrote in message
...
Peter Duniho wrote:

what we're doing in Iraq, there having been no proven connection between
terrorism and Iraq.

Yes, there is. I'd surely call disregarding international law, attacking
and invading a country without a reason and killing thousands of
innocent civilians terrorism. No, wait, there's something wrong here...


Yes...it's call intent and deliberation.

No wonder the rest of the world is so full of ****.

Matt Barrow wrote:

Yes...it's call intent and deliberation.

Guess what? Most victims don't care. And even those who do don't usually
think that the desire of making money with their oil is a valid reason
to kill them.

No wonder the rest of the world is so full of ****.

Then why the desire to invade it? But what do I expect from a country
which has been built on a genozide.

Stefan