Leaving the community

Peter Duniho wrote:

what we're doing in Iraq, there having been no proven connection between
terrorism and Iraq.

Yes, there is. I'd surely call disregarding international law, attacking
and invading a country without a reason and killing thousands of
innocent civilians terrorism. No, wait, there's something wrong here...

Stefan

"Stefan" wrote in message
...
what we're doing in Iraq, there having been no proven connection between
terrorism and Iraq.

Yes, there is. I'd surely call disregarding international law, attacking
and invading a country without a reason and killing thousands of innocent
civilians terrorism.

Yeah, sorry...I should have been more specific. "No proven connection prior
to our invasion of Iraq between terrorism by Islamic radicals and Iraq".

No, wait, there's something wrong here...

Yes, there is.

"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Stefan" wrote in message
...
what we're doing in Iraq, there having been no proven connection
between
terrorism and Iraq.

Yes, there is. I'd surely call disregarding international law, attacking
and invading a country without a reason and killing thousands of
innocent
civilians terrorism.

Yeah, sorry...I should have been more specific. "No proven connection
prior
to our invasion of Iraq between terrorism by Islamic radicals and Iraq".


Well yes, actually, there was a proven connection even during Clinton's
time. Saddam regularly paid bounties to the families of suicide bombers for
Hamas and offered rewards for anyone who would kill Americans.

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
Well yes, actually, there was a proven connection even during Clinton's
time. Saddam regularly paid bounties to the families of suicide bombers
for
Hamas and offered rewards for anyone who would kill Americans.

Ahh, right. The Hamas. Remind me again...they were the ones that planned
the 9/11 attacks then? Oh, no...it wasn't them, was it?

I'm still waiting for the "connection" that explains why we're in Iraq now.

Peter Duniho wrote:

I'm still waiting for the "connection" that explains why we're in Iraq now.

I doubt it will surface for many years. The president said he would still have
invaded even if he had known there were no WMDs and no connection between Al Quaida
and Sadam, so I'd say the real reasons for the invasion are things that haven't been
made public by the administration. Lots of other people have advanced theories,
though.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


Peter Duniho wrote:

I'm still waiting for the "connection" that explains why we're in Iraq
now.

I doubt it will surface for many years. The president said he would still
have
invaded even if he had known there were no WMDs and no connection between
Al Quaida
and Sadam

In fact, Kerry has said the same thing.

"Stefan" wrote in message
...
Peter Duniho wrote:

what we're doing in Iraq, there having been no proven connection between
terrorism and Iraq.

Yes, there is. I'd surely call disregarding international law, attacking
and invading a country without a reason and killing thousands of
innocent civilians terrorism. No, wait, there's something wrong here...


Yes...it's call intent and deliberation.

No wonder the rest of the world is so full of ****.

Matt Barrow wrote:

Yes...it's call intent and deliberation.

Guess what? Most victims don't care. And even those who do don't usually
think that the desire of making money with their oil is a valid reason
to kill them.

No wonder the rest of the world is so full of ****.

Then why the desire to invade it? But what do I expect from a country
which has been built on a genozide.

Stefan

Then why the desire to invade it? But what do I expect from a country
which has been built on a genozide.

???

Which country was built on "genozide"?
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"