A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Leaving the community



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 10th 04, 09:12 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Stefan" wrote in message
...
what we're doing in Iraq, there having been no proven connection

between
terrorism and Iraq.


Yes, there is. I'd surely call disregarding international law, attacking
and invading a country without a reason and killing thousands of

innocent
civilians terrorism.


Yeah, sorry...I should have been more specific. "No proven connection

prior
to our invasion of Iraq between terrorism by Islamic radicals and Iraq".


Well yes, actually, there was a proven connection even during Clinton's
time. Saddam regularly paid bounties to the families of suicide bombers for
Hamas and offered rewards for anyone who would kill Americans.


  #2  
Old November 10th 04, 07:03 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
Well yes, actually, there was a proven connection even during Clinton's
time. Saddam regularly paid bounties to the families of suicide bombers
for
Hamas and offered rewards for anyone who would kill Americans.


Ahh, right. The Hamas. Remind me again...they were the ones that planned
the 9/11 attacks then? Oh, no...it wasn't them, was it?

I'm still waiting for the "connection" that explains why we're in Iraq now.


  #3  
Old November 10th 04, 07:29 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Peter Duniho wrote:

I'm still waiting for the "connection" that explains why we're in Iraq now.


I doubt it will surface for many years. The president said he would still have
invaded even if he had known there were no WMDs and no connection between Al Quaida
and Sadam, so I'd say the real reasons for the invasion are things that haven't been
made public by the administration. Lots of other people have advanced theories,
though.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.
  #4  
Old November 11th 04, 04:05 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


Peter Duniho wrote:

I'm still waiting for the "connection" that explains why we're in Iraq

now.

I doubt it will surface for many years. The president said he would still

have
invaded even if he had known there were no WMDs and no connection between

Al Quaida
and Sadam


In fact, Kerry has said the same thing.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Report Leaving Assigned Altitude? John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 81 March 20th 04 02:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.