A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Leaving the community



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 10th 04, 06:23 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



C J Campbell wrote:

If you get right down to it, the only arguments against murder or theft are
basically religious.


Well, if you kill a man, he won't be paying income taxes anymore. There may even be
some drain on the state funds to support his dependents in some fashion. And if
thieves take much of his property, he may be unable to pay his taxes. It also
encourages theft, and the government hates competition.

Either has adverse effects on the health of society, and, like any good parasite
(symbiotic or not), government has a vested interest in keeping its host healthy.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.
  #2  
Old November 11th 04, 04:10 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


C J Campbell wrote:

If you get right down to it, the only arguments against murder or theft

are
basically religious.


Well, if you kill a man, he won't be paying income taxes anymore. There

may even be
some drain on the state funds to support his dependents in some fashion.

And if
thieves take much of his property, he may be unable to pay his taxes. It

also
encourages theft, and the government hates competition.

Either has adverse effects on the health of society, and, like any good

parasite
(symbiotic or not), government has a vested interest in keeping its host

healthy.

So? There is no cost, either societally or economically, if gay marriages
are legalized?

Besides, why should the government care whether it collects taxes?


  #3  
Old November 11th 04, 07:08 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
So? There is no cost, either societally or economically, if gay marriages
are legalized?


Other than the usual cost of marriage, no. There's nothing special about
gay marriages that make them any worse than any other marriage.

Besides, why should the government care whether it collects taxes?


All depends on the taxpayer, I'd guess.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Report Leaving Assigned Altitude? John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 81 March 20th 04 02:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.