![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
flying_monkey wrote:
The flights I'm talking about both show that they have pressure altitude sensors. The two airports I checked in the area both showed baro readings of around 29.82 at the time being examined in the flight, which could account for 100' of error. But, the takeoff altitudes match the takeoff airport elevation within 57' at most. The GPS altitudes reported were as high as 19,000 ft, while the highest pressure altitude reported was near 18,500. I'm removing one of those particular flights from my consideration, as the overage was probably only about 34 feet, and I could easily imagine that his altimeter was off by that much. The other flight, though, would have almost certainly indicated as high as 18,400. That's an obvious violation. But what I'm really curious about is why SeeYou doesn't report this as a violation when that function is activated. 1. Do you know the pilot didn't have clearance? 2. Are you aware of the size of potential altimeter errors at high altitudes? The altimeter used for inflight reference could easily have indicated 400' lower than the baro reference you see on OLC. 3. Fly your own ship. Jack |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Carrying flight gear on the airlines | Peter MacPherson | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 04 12:29 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |