![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
5Z wrote:
.... -Tom CFIG, PVT ASEL with about 150 hours in airplanes, no instrument experience, and not planning to fly into clouds anytime soon. Funny that despite your non existing experience and intention, you seem to be the only one who actually understands what cloud flying in gliders is all about. Stefan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
5Z wrote:
snoop wrote: This whole discussion is about SOARING in clouds. What we are talking about is operation at say, 6,000' AGL and above in the middle of Kansas. The only issues are about what is required to be legal to continue circling up into that nice towering cu. And once topped out at FL200, the glider pops out the side, then continues on to the next nice cloud in VMC. This has been a fascinating discussion, but this post from 5Z is the only one which actually made any sense to me. I don't come from the Land of the Free but from over-regulated UK. To fly in clouds I make sure I'm not in danger of entering controlled airspace, call on 103.4, and if no-one answers that they're in the same cloud I climb into it. No instrument rating, nothing but my own assessment of whether I can do it safely. That's our law. I'm sure there's an offence of reckless flying (or equivalent), but I'm prepared to defend my decision so off I go. Now, if 5Z could tell me how to straighten up and pop out of the side, rather than blundering about on strange ellipses and eventually sinking out of the bottom, I might be able to make use of cloud climbs. What does concern me is this fear of the regulations. OK, I'm a lawyer, but that just means I know that there's no certainty in any laws. My view is that if it's not specifically outlawed, and you think that it's safe and a desirable thing to do, then you should just do it. No prosecutor brings a case if there not a better than 50/50 chance of winning. If we're going to restrict ourselves to what's completely risk free, why are we flying? And if any of us stop doing what is, more likely than not, legal in our countries, some regulator will use that as an excuse to stop us doing it in future because there's no demand for it. What's wrong with you guys? Was the Boston Tea Party for nothing? If you meet the FAR requirements and want to fly in clouds, why aren't you doing it? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kid day at the airport... | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 92 | September 20th 05 04:42 AM |
Passing of Richard Miller | [email protected] | Soaring | 5 | April 5th 05 01:54 AM |
Mountain Flying Course: Colorado, Apr, Jun, Aug 2005 | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | April 3rd 05 08:48 PM |
Four States and the Grand Canyon | Mary Daniel or David Grah | Soaring | 6 | December 6th 04 10:36 AM |
ADV: CPA Mountain Flying Course 2004 Dates | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | February 13th 04 04:30 AM |