![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not quit the same issue as fortunately I still don't need anything but
1.25+ cheaters for PC and reading. I found Personal Optics 'Twin Vision' just the ticket. Brown-yellow tint (my preferred), small cheater lenses (great for maps and PDA), and spring hinges. $12.00 a pair at the time, so I snagged about six pairs for this season and have only scratched one so far and haven't stepped on any. Looks like I may have enough for next season also. Frank Whiteley Matt Herron Jr. wrote: I have worn contacts for 30 years, and have been wearing reading glasses for about 5. I tried progressive sunglasses made to order for flying, but they tended to create so much distortion in the transition zone from the uncorrected top area to the bifocal area, that they made me a little queasy. I also didn't trust my depth perception in that zone. I ended up exchanging them for standard bi-focals, but asked that the corrected area start a little lower than normal. That way I have a clear view right above the instrument panel (where most of the action takes place) and while looking down and to the side. I can look down my nose a bit or push the glasses up on my nose if I need to get a larger corrected field of view for the instruments. In a pinch, you can buy "sunreaders" from the drugstore for $15 also. I know this one will be controversial, but I also like flying with polarized bi-focal glasses. You can order them this way, but I have never found them "off the shelf". They make it much easier to pick out other traffic against a darker blue sky, and I can still see all instruments in the cockpit, including my iPaq and L-NAV just fine. I don't fly power, so that might be different. Matt Herron Jr. Graeme Cant wrote: Kevin Anderson wrote: I would like to hear back from others on what decision they made on progressive vs. lined lenses for sunglasses? I found progressives to be too distorting. The countryside swims at the edges as you move your head. Also, progressives have a very narrow width for reading - about the width of a newspaper column. I've happily flown with bi/trifocals for over 15 years. They're not hard to get in sunglasses or use magnetic-type clipons over your normal clear lenses. I found some good Pentax clipons with lenses larger than the current miniature fashion. Be very particular about where the line is put. If he doesn't ask, bring up the question yourself. GC Thanks Kevin SGS 1-26 192 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank Whiteley" wrote in message oups.com... Not quit the same issue as fortunately I still don't need anything but 1.25+ cheaters for PC and reading. I found Personal Optics 'Twin Vision' just the ticket. Brown-yellow tint (my preferred), small cheater lenses (great for maps and PDA), and spring hinges. $12.00 a pair at the time, so I snagged about six pairs for this season and have only scratched one so far and haven't stepped on any. Looks like I may have enough for next season also. Frank Whiteley URL for Personal Optics? Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
3 1/8" instrument template | [email protected] | Home Built | 4 | April 15th 06 02:26 AM |
Beyond the helicoter | Big John | Piloting | 7 | May 7th 05 12:32 AM |
Pay-out winch video | Gary Boggs | Soaring | 11 | October 18th 04 09:56 AM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
CAD outline of Rans S6S instrument panel? | Rob Turk | Home Built | 2 | October 21st 03 09:27 PM |