A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Silly controller



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 27th 06, 06:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default Silly controller


"Christopher C. Stacy" wrote in message
...

How do you both know when the approach is no longer "practice"?
Is "practice approach" in the ATC manual? (I haven't looked.)


Yes.

http://www.faa.gov/atpubs/ATC/Chp4/atc0408.html#4-8-11



When asked for an analysis of the scenario and the phraseology,
Boston didn't seem to recognize "practice approach".
In the discussion when I said "practice approach", he read it
back to me as "multiple approaches in VFR conditions".


Perhaps you didn't explain adequately, perhaps you weren't talking to a
sharp trooper.


  #2  
Old August 27th 06, 09:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Andrew Gideon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 516
Default Silly controller

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:32:03 +0000, Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

Yes.

http://www.faa.gov/atpubs/ATC/Chp4/atc0408.html#4-8-11


Regarding the difference between 2. and 3.: When would "procedures require
application of IFR separation to VFR aircraft practicing instrument
approaches" as opposed to "Where separation services are not provided to
VFR aircraft practicing instrument approaches"?

- Andrew

  #3  
Old August 27th 06, 10:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Silly controller



Andrew Gideon wrote:


Regarding the difference between 2. and 3.: When would "procedures require
application of IFR separation to VFR aircraft practicing instrument
approaches" as opposed to "Where separation services are not provided to
VFR aircraft practicing instrument approaches"?


It depends. Most facilities have a letter to airmen out there that says
they will provide services to the extent possible. If so then the
facility must provide the three mile separation(500 feet vertical)
unless there's a good reason they can't.
  #4  
Old August 28th 06, 09:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default Silly controller


"Andrew Gideon" wrote in message
news

Regarding the difference between 2. and 3.: When would "procedures require
application of IFR separation to VFR aircraft practicing instrument
approaches" as opposed to "Where separation services are not provided to
VFR aircraft practicing instrument approaches"?


It is FAA policy that IFR separation should be provided to VFR aircraft
practicing instrument approaches wherever it can be provided. Where it is
done a letter to airmen is issued advising the users of those airports where
standard separation is provided for VFR aircraft conducting practice
instrument approaches. Why this policy was set is beyond me.


  #5  
Old August 27th 06, 10:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
skym
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 67
Default Silly controller


Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
...
Perhaps you didn't explain adequately, perhaps you weren't talking to a
sharp trooper.


Uh, I really hope all you ATC guys are "sharp troopers." You're
scaring me.

  #6  
Old August 27th 06, 10:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Silly controller



skym wrote:

Uh, I really hope all you ATC guys are "sharp troopers." You're
scaring me.


Stop by the tower sometime and have your eyes opened. Get your plane
back yet?
  #7  
Old August 27th 06, 10:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
skym
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 67
Default Silly controller


Newps wrote:

Stop by the tower sometime and have your eyes opened. Get your plane
back yet?


"It's in the paint shop." I hope this isn't like "the check's in the
mail."

  #8  
Old August 28th 06, 09:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default Silly controller


"skym" wrote in message
ups.com...

Uh, I really hope all you ATC guys are "sharp troopers." You're
scaring me.


Some are, some are not.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
What was controller implying?? Bill J Instrument Flight Rules 65 September 28th 04 12:32 AM
Columns by a Canadian centre controller David Megginson Instrument Flight Rules 1 August 9th 04 10:05 PM
Skyguide traffic controller killed HECTOP Piloting 39 March 3rd 04 01:46 AM
AmeriFlight Crash C J Campbell Piloting 5 December 1st 03 02:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.