![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Greg Farris wrote:
In article , says... Matt Whiting wrote: It isn't that hard to overcome the trim on a 172. There are probably airplanes where this isn't the case, but the 172 isn't one of them. In theory, it should be possible on any plane. 14 CFR 23.677 (d) says: Say that to the 130 souls who perished in the B-707 accident on takeoff from Paris' Orly airport, due to an out-of-trim condition. http://aviation-safety.net/database/...0603-0&lang=en The fact that the pilot didn't fly the airplane to its capability doesn't mean the capability isn't there. Matt |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Greg Farris" wrote Say that to the 130 souls who perished in the B-707 accident on takeoff from Paris' Orly airport, due to an out-of-trim condition. It is really easy to sit back and say that the accident was easily preventable, but in truth, it probably was easily preventable. Problem number one, in the chain of the accident events, was the failure of the trim motor. Number two, was the failure of the flight crew to recognize that the trim was not in the correct place. Number three, and the final link in the chain, was the failure of the flight crew to continue with the takeoff, when there was insufficient distance in which to stop the aircraft. If the takeoff had continued, the certification standards say that a successful takeoff was still possible. In a fraction of a second, the flight crew made the wrong choice, because there was not enough distance remaining to successfully abort the takeoff. They, and their charges, paid for the mistake with their lives. The final link in the chain was not broken. Sad, but mistakes (pilot error) still happen. -- Jim in NC |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Greg Farris wrote:
In article , says... Matt Whiting wrote: It isn't that hard to overcome the trim on a 172. There are probably airplanes where this isn't the case, but the 172 isn't one of them. In theory, it should be possible on any plane. 14 CFR 23.677 (d) says: Say that to the 130 souls who perished in the B-707 accident on takeoff from Paris' Orly airport, due to an out-of-trim condition. http://aviation-safety.net/database/...0603-0&lang=en The B707 was not certified per 14 CFR 23. (It was most likely certified under 14 CFR 25 or its predecessor). I assume the earlier poster's "any plane" before he mentioned meant 14 CFR 23.677 (d) "any plane certified under 14 CFR 23. YMMV. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 07:58 PM |
| Approaches and takeoff mins. | jamin3508 | Instrument Flight Rules | 22 | September 14th 05 03:51 AM |
| Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 3 | August 13th 04 01:18 PM |
| Overweight takeoff / flight | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 50 | December 4th 03 12:53 AM |