![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kyler Laird" wrote in message news ![]() Years ago I was leaving Purdue http://www.airnav.com/airport/LAF before the tower opened. (I think I was headed to Hamfest with some friends. I don't usually get airborne that early.) As I taxied to runway 5 I heard the local turboprop commuter (Mesaba, I think) call a taxi to runway 10. I was headed away from him so I didn't see him until I turned to do my runup. When I finished my runup I realized that he had followed me. I thought about saying something but just then a controller jumped in and vectored the plane to runway 10. I always wondered what would have happened if that controller hadn't gotten there early and said something (and I'd kept my mouth shut). Would they have made it off the 4226' runway (5/23)? They regularly fly in and out of 10/28 (6600') so I suspect that they could perform a standard takeoff on 5 even though they might not handle an engine loss as gracefully. I wonder how often this (almost) happens. --kyler It can happen and has happened and will happen again as long as pilots don't remember to physically check the runway heading by glancing at the DG or HSI, or even the magnetic compass EVERY time they line up for takeoff. This should be an automatic reflex action for a pilot, especially at busy airports where runways are 30 degrees or less apart in direction. Dudley Henriques |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:
It can happen and has happened and will happen again as long as pilots don't remember to physically check the runway heading by glancing at the DG or HSI, or even the magnetic compass EVERY time they line up for takeoff. This should be an automatic reflex action for a pilot, especially at busy airports where runways are 30 degrees or less apart in direction. Dudley Henriques It really makes you wonder about the procedures on that China Airlines 747 that not only took of from a taxiway in 2002, but the taxiway was not even beside the assigned runway. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Many times it's something very small or something omitted in a sequence that
can cause these accidents. Something as basic as a heading check for the right runway can be lost in a last minute conversation between two pilots as the airplane makes the turn from the taxiway to the takeoff position; a sudden distraction; a last second joke; anything that breaks a normal habit pattern. Its SO easy!!!!!!! DH "James Robinson" wrote in message .. . "Dudley Henriques" wrote: It can happen and has happened and will happen again as long as pilots don't remember to physically check the runway heading by glancing at the DG or HSI, or even the magnetic compass EVERY time they line up for takeoff. This should be an automatic reflex action for a pilot, especially at busy airports where runways are 30 degrees or less apart in direction. Dudley Henriques It really makes you wonder about the procedures on that China Airlines 747 that not only took of from a taxiway in 2002, but the taxiway was not even beside the assigned runway. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Many times it's something very small or something omitted in a sequence that
can cause these accidents. Something as basic as a heading check for the right runway can be lost in a last minute conversation between two pilots as the airplane makes the turn from the taxiway to the takeoff position; a sudden distraction; a last second joke; anything that breaks a normal habit pattern. Its SO easy!!!!!!! It is... and my understanding is that's the reason for the sterile cockpit rule. Incidentally, there was an off-duty pilot sitting in the jumpseat in the cockpit along for the ride on the Comair flight. Wouldn't surprise me if things got a little too relaxed that early in the morning for just a brief moment. -- Guy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Guy Elden Jr wrote: Many times it's something very small or something omitted in a sequence that can cause these accidents. Something as basic as a heading check for the right runway can be lost in a last minute conversation between two pilots as the airplane makes the turn from the taxiway to the takeoff position; a sudden distraction; a last second joke; anything that breaks a normal habit pattern. Its SO easy!!!!!!! It is... and my understanding is that's the reason for the sterile cockpit rule. Incidentally, there was an off-duty pilot sitting in the jumpseat in the cockpit along for the ride on the Comair flight. Wouldn't surprise me if things got a little too relaxed that early in the morning for just a brief moment. Plus it was a 0600 flight, which meant awakening at around 0430. With a muggy motel room listening to countless AC units hum, I wonder what their sleep situation was ?? JG -- Guy |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message Plus it was a 0600 flight, which meant awakening at around 0430. With a muggy motel room listening to countless AC units hum, I wonder what their sleep situation was ?? It was clearly reported shortly after the crash that their rest period had been "well in excess of" the required amount. An 0430 wake up should not be problematic for a flight crew - its normal. You just hit the rack by 8 or 9 PM. Same deal for 0200, or 2300 for that matter. As to the picture you paint of shabby, low-grade accommodations, all I can say is that its highly unlikely. Even 25-30 years ago flying regional, we stayed in reasonable places such as Ramada, Hampton, or HI. A simple search showed that within 5 miles or so of the field there are about 11 national name hotels that offer good reasonable quality, and very often free stuff for flight crews, iirc. It would be very easy to ascertain exactly where they stayed. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() John Gaquin wrote: wrote in message Plus it was a 0600 flight, which meant awakening at around 0430. With a muggy motel room listening to countless AC units hum, I wonder what their sleep situation was ?? It was clearly reported shortly after the crash that their rest period had been "well in excess of" the required amount. An 0430 wake up should not be problematic for a flight crew - its normal. You just hit the rack by 8 or 9 PM. Same deal for 0200, or 2300 for that matter. They were all out of town based according to news reports: "Bornhorst would not say whether the crew had experience flying into and out of the Blue Grass Airport. The first officer and flight attendant had been based out of New York, the pilot out of Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport, according to the airline. Bornhorst did say that the crew was well rested and had spent the night in Lexington in preparation for the early-morning takeoff." You can hit the hay at 9pm, but falling asleep with motel noises is another matter...JG As to the picture you paint of shabby, low-grade accommodations, all I can say is that its highly unlikely. Even 25-30 years ago flying regional, we stayed in reasonable places such as Ramada, Hampton, or HI. A simple search showed that within 5 miles or so of the field there are about 11 national name hotels that offer good reasonable quality, and very often free stuff for flight crews, iirc. It would be very easy to ascertain exactly where they stayed. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Guy Elden Jr" wrote:
Incidentally, there was an off-duty pilot sitting in the jumpseat in the cockpit along for the ride on the Comair flight. Wouldn't surprise me if things got a little too relaxed that early in the morning for just a brief moment. The media reports have stated there was an off-duty pilot in the jumpseat, but later reports say it was an AirTran pilot. I don't believe the security rules, post 911, would allow him in the cockpit, so I suspect that he was likely in the passenger compartment, and not in the jumpseat. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I took a freind up today and he asked how something like that can happen. My
answer was simple, their human. Its SO easy!!!!!!! It is... and my understanding is that's the reason for the sterile cockpit rule. Incidentally, there was an off-duty pilot sitting in the jumpseat in the cockpit along for the ride on the Comair flight. Wouldn't surprise me if things got a little too relaxed that early in the morning for just a brief moment. -- Guy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 6th 06 11:13 PM |
Pilot claims no blame in July crash | Mortimer Schnerd, RN | Piloting | 48 | March 15th 06 09:00 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Doubts raised in jet crash | Dave Butler | Piloting | 8 | July 26th 05 01:25 AM |
Yet another A36 crash | H.P. | Piloting | 10 | April 23rd 05 05:58 PM |