|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
August 29th 06, 05:59 PM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
Comair Pilot Error
C. Massey wrote:
OK... But what I don't understand is why would they have two runways that are the same surface width, but it is listed as a 75 ft runway they way it is marked? It seems to me that if they are the same surface width, they would mark both of them the same usable width. They've stopped maintaining the surface along the perimeters as a cost saving measure, so they then demark the interior 75 feet as useable. They are obligated to maintain the useable portion but not the unusable portion. I would imagine at some point in the future Lexington will end up closing the shorter runway entirely just to be free of the expense. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
| Fact or satirical fiction? | [email protected] | Piloting | 23 | March 28th 06 01:28 AM |
| I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
| Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Hybrid Mode
