CRJ crash at KLEX:

"Jose" wrote in message
et...

It matters because you, the stickler for grammatical accuracy, asked a
general question (which was triggered by a specific context).


You're contradicting yourself. It would have been a general question
without the quoted material, but the quoted material was there.



That depends on the reason the takeoff clearance was immediate, and (if
it's due to incoming traffic) how close it was. Cancelling the takeoff
clearance and telling the landing traffic to go around (if that's what the
issue is) comes to mind.


It was due to incoming traffic and the traffic was close enough to require
an immediate takeoff or wait for the traffic to land.



You're a controller. What would your response be?


"Unable. Cleared for immediate takeoff or exit the runway without delay."

You're contradicting yourself. It would have been a general question
without the quoted material, but the quoted material was there.

The question is what it is. It is a general question.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

"Jose" wrote in message
m...

The question is what it is. It is a general question.


You're wrong.

You're wrong.

No, you're wrong.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

"Jose" wrote in message
m...

No, you're wrong.


You're wrong again.

You're wrong again.

This is just contradiction, and I'm not allowed to argue unless you've paid.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

"Jose" wrote in message
. net...

This is just contradiction, and I'm not allowed to argue unless you've
paid.


You're not capable of argument.