![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() They legally narrowed the runway using a paintbrush. They only have to maintain and keep up/repave/resurface (if they do it at all) the actual runway (which is listed at 75 feet wide, but is in the middle of the 150 ft wide paved area. Dave C. Massey wrote: OK... But what I don't understand is why would they have two runways that are the same surface width, but it is listed as a 75 ft runway they way it is marked? It seems to me that if they are the same surface width, they would mark both of them the same usable width. --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0635-1, 08/28/2006 Tested on: 8/29/2006 8:02:18 AM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Fact or satirical fiction? | [email protected] | Piloting | 23 | March 28th 06 01:28 AM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |