![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ramy,
The problem is that TCAS will display you as a target with altitude unknown (unless you have mode c with an encoding altimeter). Therefore, TCAS will only call you out as traffic and display your position without generating a Resolution Advisory (RA). We see this pretty often as VFR traffic. We will be looking hard for the traffic, but won't necessarily maneuver the aircraft, since we can't see altitude/heading. If in fact, the sailplane does have mode C with an encoding altimeter, then the RA will be generated and you should see the big bird maneuver to avoid the conflict. Note that a TCAS RA will direct maneuvering in the vertical only, since TCAS azimuth is considered too innacurate to generate turn-based avoidance. Typical RAs would be "Climb,Climb, Climb - Descend, Descend, Descend - Reduce Climb - Reduce Descent, etc". I guess I figured most of the gliders with transponders weren't using Mode C, so good catch. Glen "Ramy" wrote in message ups.com... Thanks for the excellent overview, Glen. Regarding number 3, why would a TCAS equipped airliner pilot need to see me if the TCAS gives the resolution? I'm pretty sure most of the airliners vectored around me never actually see me (although I always wave ;-) Ramy Glen Kelley wrote: A few additions to Kirk's excellent points - from the background of former fighter pilot, current airline pilot, and current glider pilot: 1. We often surprise each other in sailplanes with how hard it is to see each other. Don't expect an airline pilot to be any better at it! The fighter pilot at least will have good visual acuity and is used to looking for small targets. 2. Airline pilots don't carry sectionals - at the speeds we operate, there would be little time to use them anyway. Fighter pilots will carry a low level map and will have thought about visual traffic conflicts, wires, terrain, etc in the planning stages. At the speeds they operate, they aren't looking at those maps very often, once airborne. 3. The busier glider operations are notam'd and often referred to by atc controllers. If you have an operable transponder, you will *normally* be called out by atc and if TCAS equipped, airline pilots will be aware of your location. They would still have to see you to maneuver away from you. (See note 1.) Big airliners are not very maneuverable (mine - the Boeing 737 - is limited to 2.5 g!). 4. Fighters are a different case. They don't have TCAS and only some of them have the ability to interrogate/detect transponder targets. Some of them have air intercept radar capability, but sailplanes are small radar targets and will often (usually!) be filtered out because of their low speeds and altitudes - like highway traffic. If they are at low altitude, fighters usually operate at high speed (420 - 540 indicated, except the A-10). As Kirk pointed out they will almost never be alone, but will be in formations of 2 - 4. When low level (100 to 1500 agl, most commonly 300 - 500agl), they will normally *not* be receiving traffic information from ATC. When operating in a MOA, there may be intercept controllers who can call out glider traffic, but again, without a transponder, it is unlikely. The formations will vary, but most pairs of flight lead and wingman will be laterally spread by 5000 to 10000 feet, for visual lookout. The flight lead will be spending quite a bit of his time looking forward for threat detection and navigation, but the wingman will be spending less time looking forward because he must maintain formation. If they see you, they have an excellent capability to avoid you. Head on and tail on, the sailplane has the tiny visual profile that fighter designers dream of.... In other words, you are nearly invisible unless you have a wing up in a turn/thermal. 5. As Kirk said, the primary threat is at 6 o'clock, because it is the hardest to see - essentially, only the overtaking aircraft has a reasonable chance of avoiding a collision. Therefore, if you know you are operating in a high threat area: MOA, low level route, approach corridor, VFR flyway, near an airport etc, I would "belly check" periodically, depending on the nature of the threat. The timing is based on the amount of time it takes for the threat aircraft to close from outside visual range to hitting me from the 6 o'clock position. I use visual ranges of 8nm for airliners, 5 nm for small commercial jets (corporate and regional jets) and fighters, and 3 nm for light aircraft - adjust as your visual acuity and experience dictate. I use worst-case speeds as follows: airliner and small jets - 4 nm/min, fighters - 8 nm/min, and light aircraft - 2.5 nm/min. Combing detection ranges and times, I calculate: airliners - 2 min, small jets - 1 min and 15 sec, fighters - roughly 40 sec, and light planes - approx 1 min and 15 sec. So... if you are straight and level for more than these times, there is sufficient time for an aircraft to move from outside (my) visual range to the same airspace as my (your) little pink body. As you would probably guess, fighters are the worst case because of their relatively small size and high closure rate. On the positive side, there are typically more eyeballs with better acuity and better maneuverability involved. Interestingly, small jets and light aircraft are not that far behind, as far as detection time is concerned. In my experience they are far less likely to see you than the fighters. The same is true for airliners, but because of their size you have more time to see them coming... 6. How to do a belly check: No, I don't hack a stopwatch, but I keep the above times in mind with respect to the likely threat for my area. My primary threat is small jet/light aircraft that operate on various highway/flyways and approach corridors. Away from these specific areas, traffic density is extremely low. First clear your "new six" - if you are going to turn left, look to the area behind to the right 4 - 5 oclock position - this will be your new blind spot. Next clear your new nose position - this is where you are going to roll out. Finally make a 45 deg turn to the left and visually clear your "old six", which is now at your left 7 to 8 o'clock. Often/usually, a belly check can be incorporated into turns you are going to make anyway, for other reasons. When you visually clear, make sure you focus on something on the horizon, otherwise you are only visually clearing out to an arms length. If I really need to hold a straight line, I do the belly check as a gentle 45 deg turn to each side. 7. In a thermal, periodically check to the outside of your term to clear your "new six". If there are other sailplanes with you in the thermal, of course they are the primary threats for midair, but you still need to check for other aircraft. Fortunately, you are easier to see while turning - as long as the other pilots are looking... 8. Proximity to clouds. You need to think about what you are doing when you are near cloudbase, in proximity to likely IFR traffic. If you are 500' below cloudbase (perfectly legal), and an airliner descends out of the cloud at 250kt on his descent profile on collision course (perfectly legal), there may be as little as 20 seconds to impact. If you are tail on when this happens - good luck. I'm sure no one would ever be right at cloudbase on a nice day, because that would violate the FARs - more importantly, you are "rolling the bones" every time you do this on a known approach corridor. 9. Conclusion. If you fly in a high airliner/small jet threat area and can afford a transponder it will help other people see/avoid you. If your primary threat comes from military operations in MOAs, I would not spend the money on a transponder unless I knew those fighters have intercept/atc controllers passing them information. The various TPAS - type devices will help your see/avoid efforts and should help in the case of fighters, although the flight lead is likely the only one squawking in the formation. Only you/your club knows the primary threats for your particular operating area and you need to understand what they are. Taylor your altitude awareness/cloud avoidance and belly check frequency to the nature of your local area. Don't cede visual lookout/avoidance responsibility to someone else - ever. Sailplane right-of-way is a myth in most situations and a comfort only to your survivors/legal counsel. Hope this helps. Glen |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Water into wine? Bubba and I have been tryin' to figure out how to turn
water into Shiner Bock. Anyway, Kirk, I was looking at the Reno/Minden area arrival procedures and almost all of them have in a BIG box the words, Caution Intensive Glider traffic, or something to that effect. I haven't read back through the thread, to see which arrival is in question, but it appears to me that our local glider folks have done their homework, with regard to putting up the big billboard for those of us who come zipping through that airspace in hi performance aircraft, that there are other aircraft in the area. Be aware. I fly out of Dallas Love for work and Texas Soaring for fun. When I've been at work and flying that one arrival, which puts us on top of TSA, I always ask the controller, "is there any glider activity today"? Plus I call on 123.3 to see if anyone is up. This doesn't happen that often, but when it has been a nice day, and the possibility of glider activity exists I do these things. Playing the devils advocate, I was asking Bubba, in another thread, what the chances are that the glider pilot will be asked about his installation and use of oxygen at 16000ft. Another angle. wrote: snoop wrote: Must be nice to walk on water! Actually, it's the water into wine trick that really wows the crowd I hang with... No apologies - the bizjet should have seen the glider. The glider also should have seen the bizjet. There may be reasons why that didn't happen - and I'll be the first to admit I've been guilty of late detection of aircraft nearby. If I screw up, I've got no problem admitting it - there really isn't much room for ego where flight safety is concerned. But I also know from first hand that all this hysteria about closing speed is BS. Even jet fighters can be seen in time to avoid. Airliners are huge and almost impossible to miss. Bizjets fit in between. But you have to be looking. Kirk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
snoop wrote:
Water into wine? Bubba and I have been tryin' to figure out how to turn water into Shiner Bock. We were enjoying a single malt Scotch after a fine day of soaring and some one said "that stuff looks like p*ss". My comment was "get me the guy that passed it and 5 gallons of water" :-). Tony V "6N" |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 6th 06 11:13 PM |
Yet another A36 crash | H.P. | Piloting | 10 | April 23rd 05 05:58 PM |
Seniors Contest | Bob Fidler | Soaring | 68 | March 17th 05 03:50 AM |
Sport Pilot - School Won't Offer | Gary G | Piloting | 38 | February 16th 05 10:41 AM |
Announce/USA: FAA Glider Flying Handbook / Bob Wander | SoarBooks | Soaring | 0 | August 11th 03 03:55 PM |