![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yup: Too little data. What method was employed to measure these values?
At what frequencies? If I remember correctly, there was a frequency/attenuation chart on the back of some foam earplugs carton I saw once in a drug store. I'm sure ANR manufacturers have plenty of charts for their products. So, data is obtainable, at least theoretically. But that doesn't mean much, since noise perception is a very psychological thing (think of all those crazy psycho-acoustic models for Hi-Fi audio noise reduction), and you cannot really go by "more decibels = better noise cancelling" principle all the time. Unfortunately, I cannot make comparisons myself, as I don't currently own an ANR set. I tried passive vs. passive+foam, and the difference was drastic. But I can't really tell how much I'm losing due to lack of selectivity of ANR without trying one. Thus the question. Andrey |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrey,
If I remember correctly, there was a frequency/attenuation chart on the back of some foam earplugs carton I saw once in a drug store. I'm sure ANR manufacturers have plenty of charts for their products. So, data is obtainable, at least theoretically. A chart alone means nothing. It all depends on how you measure that chart. But that doesn't mean much, since noise perception is a very psychological thing (think of all those crazy psycho-acoustic models for Hi-Fi audio noise reduction), Not sure about that. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From Wikipedia on "Psychoacoustics":
--- In many applications of acoustics and audio signal processing it is necessary to know what humans actually hear. Sound, which consists of air pressure waves, can be accurately measured with sophisticated equipment. However, understanding how these waves are received and mapped into thoughts in the human brain is not trivial. Recognizing features important to perception enables scientists and engineers to concentrate on audible features and ignore less important features of the involved system. It is important to note that the question of what humans hear is not only a physiological question of features of the ear but very much also a psychological issue. --- There's more in that article if you're interested. noise perception is a very psychological thing (think of all those crazy psycho-acoustic models for Hi-Fi audio noise reduction), Not sure about that. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Update on new paint job and leather seats - Trip back home | Longworth | Piloting | 6 | November 21st 05 06:52 PM |
A chance to give something back | Jack Allison | Piloting | 14 | October 23rd 05 11:41 PM |
KVUO to KAST & Back IFR 1.8 Act. 2.7 Total "First In Act. IFR X-C" | NW_PILOT | Piloting | 20 | June 29th 05 04:27 AM |
Interesting. Life history of John Lear (Bill's son) | Big John | Piloting | 7 | September 20th 04 05:24 PM |
Student Pilot Stories Wanted | Greg Burkhart | Piloting | 6 | September 18th 03 08:57 PM |