|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
August 31st 06, 12:10 AM
posted to rec.aviation.ifr
|
|||
|
|||
Legal or not?
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... Since it was a practice approach (VFR I assume) it would be legal even if the loc was out of service. However, even as an acutal IFR approach it can still be given assuming you can identify the ADF on your GPS. Why would you need to identify the ADF? 
|
|
#2
August 31st 06, 12:33 AM
posted to rec.aviation.ifr
|
|||
|
|||
|
Legal or not?
Steven P. McNicoll wrote: "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... Since it was a practice approach (VFR I assume) it would be legal even if the loc was out of service. However, even as an acutal IFR approach it can still be given assuming you can identify the ADF on your GPS. Why would you need to identify the ADF? Well, in the case of the ILS SAC its because the course from the outer marker is one degree off the localizer.  -Robert
|
|
#3
August 31st 06, 12:51 AM
posted to rec.aviation.ifr
|
|||
|
|||
|
Legal or not?
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... Steven P. McNicoll wrote: "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... Since it was a practice approach (VFR I assume) it would be legal even if the loc was out of service. However, even as an acutal IFR approach it can still be given assuming you can identify the ADF on your GPS. Why would you need to identify the ADF? Well, in the case of the ILS SAC its because the course from the outer marker is one degree off the localizer. Why would you need to identify the ADF in this case?
|
|
#4
August 31st 06, 03:23 AM
posted to rec.aviation.ifr
|
|||
|
|||
|
Legal or not?
Well, in the case of the ILS SAC its because the course from the outer
marker is one degree off the localizer. Why would you need to identify the ADF in this case? That's a good question. Steven, I actually thought you had said you were going to call the FAA on this one and question it. -Robert
|
|
#5
August 31st 06, 01:09 PM
posted to rec.aviation.ifr
|
|||
|
|||
|
Legal or not?
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... That's a good question. Steven, I actually thought you had said you were going to call the FAA on this one and question it. I said I was going to query the FAA about the SAC case, not this case.
|
|
#6
August 31st 06, 01:38 PM
posted to rec.aviation.ifr
|
|||
|
|||
|
Legal or not?
Good luck getting a straight answer. According to our club safety director
(CFII) no definitive answer has been given...the prompt for this thread. "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... Well, in the case of the ILS SAC its because the course from the outer marker is one degree off the localizer. Why would you need to identify the ADF in this case? That's a good question. Steven, I actually thought you had said you were going to call the FAA on this one and question it. -Robert ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Home Built | 3 | May 14th 04 11:55 AM |
| General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
| General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
| General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Owning | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
| General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Owning | 0 | May 11th 04 10:36 PM |
Hybrid Mode
