![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mike regish wrote:
Morality is doing the right thing just because you know it's the right thing to do, not because you think some magical being is going to strike you down from above or send you to some imaginary hell. Who determines what the "right things" are? That's morality and it doesn't involve religion. It only involves evolution, something we evidently have a long way to go on. Some more than others. Now that is funny. Morality results from evolution. Best one I've heard in a long time. Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Whiting" wrote: That's morality and it doesn't involve religion. It only involves evolution, something we evidently have a long way to go on. Some more than others. Now that is funny. Morality results from evolution. Best one I've heard in a long time. What's funny about it? -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Luke wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote: That's morality and it doesn't involve religion. It only involves evolution, something we evidently have a long way to go on. Some more than others. Now that is funny. Morality results from evolution. Best one I've heard in a long time. What's funny about it? Depends on what kind of evolution you are talking about. Biological evolution, then thats a good laugh. Societal evolution, maybe. But what drives societal evolution? How about the beliefs of those with influence. If those people are religious or had grown up with religious influences, then maybe that also deserves a chuckle because then the non-religious are ignorant to the fact they are living under religious law. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yea, those early Christians were influential as hell, weren't they?
"Brooks Hagenow" wrote in message news ![]() Dan Luke wrote: "Matt Whiting" wrote: That's morality and it doesn't involve religion. It only involves evolution, something we evidently have a long way to go on. Some more than others. Now that is funny. Morality results from evolution. Best one I've heard in a long time. What's funny about it? Depends on what kind of evolution you are talking about. Biological evolution, then thats a good laugh. Societal evolution, maybe. But what drives societal evolution? How about the beliefs of those with influence. If those people are religious or had grown up with religious influences, then maybe that also deserves a chuckle because then the non-religious are ignorant to the fact they are living under religious law. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Denton wrote:
Yea, those early Christians were influential as hell, weren't they? I did not say the Christians were funny. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What you said was: "Depends on what kind of evolution you are talking about.
Biological evolution, then that's a good laugh. Societal evolution, maybe. But what drives societal evolution? How about the beliefs of those with influence. If those people are religious or had grown up with religious influences, then maybe that also deserves a chuckle because then the non-religious are ignorant to the fact they are living under religious law." I focused on this portion, which I made sure I was not taking out of context: "But what drives societal evolution? How about the beliefs of those with influence." My point was, the early Christians, who had almost no influence, drove a great deal of societal change. And it was this societal change that later drove an increase in influence of Christians. "Funny" wasn't involved in my end of the discussion... "Brooks Hagenow" wrote in message om... Bill Denton wrote: Yea, those early Christians were influential as hell, weren't they? I did not say the Christians were funny. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brooks Hagenow" wrote: Now that is funny. Morality results from evolution. Best one I've heard in a long time. What's funny about it? Depends on what kind of evolution you are talking about. Biological evolution, then thats a good laugh. Why? -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Matt Whiting" wrote: That's morality and it doesn't involve religion. It only involves evolution, something we evidently have a long way to go on. Some more than others. Now that is funny. Morality results from evolution. Best one I've heard in a long time. What's funny about it? It's inverted...that's what's funny about it. -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Barrow" wrote: Now that is funny. Morality results from evolution. Best one I've heard in a long time. What's funny about it? It's inverted...that's what's funny about it. Sorry, I don't know what you mean by that; please explain. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Matt Barrow" wrote: Now that is funny. Morality results from evolution. Best one I've heard in a long time. What's funny about it? It's inverted...that's what's funny about it. Sorry, I don't know what you mean by that; please explain. Think: cause vs. effect. -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Report Leaving Assigned Altitude? | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 81 | March 20th 04 02:34 PM |