![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Natalie wrote:
Larry Dighera wrote: Because it is my understanding that federal regulations grant gliders right-of-way over powered aircraft. Because your understanding is incorrect and not supported by the construction of the regulation. The only part of the rules that mention category is one that begins with "Converging other than head on or nearly so." It's possible that the glider had the right of way, it's also possible that he didn't. In either case, there was DEFINITELY A FAILURE TO SEE (and avoid) as the jet pilot never saw the glider according to reports (and I suspect the glider pilot never saw the jet) so the right of way rules don't seem to have mattered because unless there you know the other guy is there there's not going to be any manouvering rules to apply. You will invariably provoke an argument by making that statement, and the argument will continue ad infinitum, even after all parties to it have read and reread the applicable FAR -- though most of your opponents will understand why you make your claim. The FAR's are written no more comprehensibly than is the norm for the Law, from the Constitution down to the lowest traffic regulation. 91.113.(d), even within the full context of 91.113, is just one example among multitudes. Recent FAR's actually seem to be more poorly written than those which have been in force for some time, indicating the problem is no more appreciated by those in charge of writing them today than ever it was, or we have simply gotten stupider. If you would care to cite some specific rulings that support your claim, that would carry some weight. If we go on about it here without such citations, at the end of 10,000 lines of rant we'll be right back at this very same spot. Jack -------- Sec. 91.113 http://tinyurl.com/loggu Right-of-way rules: Except water operations. (a) Inapplicability. This section does not apply to the operation of an aircraft on water. (b) General. When weather conditions permit, regardless of whether an operation is conducted under instrument flight rules or visual flight rules, vigilance shall be maintained by each person operating an aircraft so as to see and avoid other aircraft. When a rule of this section gives another aircraft the right-of-way, the pilot shall give way to that aircraft and may not pass over, under, or ahead of it unless well clear. (c) In distress. An aircraft in distress has the right-of-way over all other air traffic. (d) Converging. When aircraft of the same category are converging at approximately the same altitude (except head-on, or nearly so), the aircraft to the other's right has the right-of-way. If the aircraft are of different categories-- (1) A balloon has the right-of-way over any other category of aircraft; (2) A glider has the right-of-way over an airship, powered parachute, weight-shift-control aircraft, airplane, or rotorcraft. (3) An airship has the right-of-way over a powered parachute, weight-shift-control aircraft, airplane, or rotorcraft. However, an aircraft towing or refueling other aircraft has the right-of-way over all other engine-driven aircraft. (e) Approaching head-on. When aircraft are approaching each other head-on, or nearly so, each pilot of each aircraft shall alter course to the right. (f) Overtaking. Each aircraft that is being overtaken has the right-of-way and each pilot of an overtaking aircraft shall alter course to the right to pass well clear. (g) Landing. Aircraft, while on final approach to land or while landing, have the right-of-way over other aircraft in flight or operating on the surface, except that they shall not take advantage of this rule to force an aircraft off the runway surface which has already landed and is attempting to make way for an aircraft on final approach. When two or more aircraft are approaching an airport for the purpose of landing, the aircraft at the lower altitude has the right-of-way, but it shall not take advantage of this rule to cut in front of another which is on final approach to land or to overtake that aircraft. ============================= |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hawker vs. Glider Midair - with photo! | Darkwing | Piloting | 151 | September 5th 06 05:19 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Bad publicity | David Starer | Soaring | 18 | March 8th 04 03:57 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |