![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:32:47 -0400, Doug Vetter wrote:
The ability of a transponder to handle a high reply rate will become more important as more aircraft are equipped with systems such as TCAS and Skywatch that actively interrogate targets much in the same way ground facilities do. Let's assume that a [mode c] transponder is being interrogated at a rate higher than that at which it can respond. Does this matter? If the transponder is responding as quickly as it can (let's pick a hypothetic 10/second), while it is receiving [a hypothetic] 20 interrogations/second, won't each interrogator still see the 10 responses per second and therefore "see" responses to its own interrogations? Or is there some unique mapping from a specific interrogation to the specific reply? - Andrew |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
18 Oct 2005 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 19th 05 02:19 AM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |