A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why don't voice radio communications use FM?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 2nd 06, 05:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
John Gaquin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 170
Default Why don't voice radio communications use FM?


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message

....that improper and misunderstood radio
communication is a leading cause of accidents,


Cite, please.

... I can barely understand what I hear on the radio.


I suspect the reasons for this relate more to the environmental effects and
quality of the speakers, etc., than to the nature of AM transmissions.


  #2  
Old September 2nd 06, 06:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 91
Default Why don't voice radio communications use FM?

On Sat, 2 Sep 2006 12:02:26 -0400, "John Gaquin"
wrote:


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message

....that improper and misunderstood radio
communication is a leading cause of accidents,


Cite, please.

... I can barely understand what I hear on the radio.


I suspect the reasons for this relate more to the environmental effects and
quality of the speakers, etc., than to the nature of AM transmissions.


The previous comment re capture effect of FM is valid. i.e. the
strongest signal wins. This is desireable for broadcast radio but not
aviation.

With FM the signal remains much clearer until the point where it
suddenly becomes unreadable when itl becomes weak.

With AM is that readability gradually reduces as the signal gets
weaker. If you open the squelch you can often still read AM when FM
would be unreadable.

The audio bandwidth for acceptable communication is 3KHz. When
modulating an AM transmitter you have two sidebands. One up to -3KHz
the other up to +3KHz so transmitted bandwidth is 6KHz.

With an FM transmitter the bandwidth will still be 6KHz plus the
deviation of the system. In addition the sidebands theoretically
extend to infinity but they become rapidly weaker.

To get the best signal to noise ratio with FM you need higher
deviation. If you try increase the number of FM frequencies you need
to reduce the deviation. That in turn would reduce its effectivness.

As for the original comments I would suggest there's something wrong
if AM is not clear.

Could be poor hearing, inadequate headset, turning up the volume
causing overload of either headset or receiver audio. Ignition or
alternator interference distorting the received signal, poor
transmitter, poor microphone, poor microphone technique.
Sorry but the problem is NOT AM!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder John Doe Piloting 145 March 31st 06 06:58 PM
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? Ric Home Built 2 September 13th 05 09:39 PM
I Hate Radios Ron Wanttaja Home Built 9 June 6th 05 05:39 PM
AirCraft Radio Communications [email protected] Rotorcraft 0 November 13th 03 12:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.