![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Vaughn Simon" wrote:
But changing to FM would require a new radio to be simultaneously installed in every cockpit in the world. The only way to accomplish that would be for every plane with a new radio to transmit in "parallel" (as someone already suggested) for a period of years on both the new mode and the old mode. That need not be the case, as evidenced by dual-mode cell phones that allow access to analog and digital cell sites, though not both at the same time. Newer radios could certainly be made capable of either mode and a future cutoff date X years in the future could be set for required switchover when older model radios would be required to be replaced. This would certainly ease the transition woes. Actually, not much does change in aviation compared with other fields of human endeavor. It does seem that way. Unfortunately I don't think there is anyone in the FAA or even the avionics industry who is both sufficiently knowledgeable about recent advances in communications and has the clout and vision to push for a radical improvement of aviation communication. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Logajan" wrote in message .. . "Vaughn Simon" wrote: But changing to FM would require a new radio to be simultaneously installed in every cockpit in the world. The only way to accomplish that would be for every plane with a new radio to transmit in "parallel" (as someone already suggested) for a period of years on both the new mode and the old mode. That need not be the case, as evidenced by dual-mode cell phones that allow access to analog and digital cell sites, The problem I was thinking of that is solved by parallel operation is where you have two planes in the same pattern who can't hear each other because their radios are not compatible. The only way I know to solve that is dual (parallel) operation. A good example of that concept is what they are doing with TV today. Many TV stations are transmitting in both analog and digital (HD) so that we are covered no matter what type of receiver we happen to own. Vaughn |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
I Hate Radios | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 9 | June 6th 05 05:39 PM |
AirCraft Radio Communications | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 0 | November 13th 03 12:48 AM |