![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My flying buddy had a Duchess about 10 years ago. It was a great plane. He
now has a Barron, the Barron is nice real nice the only problem is fuel. I hate going on long trips because it cost to much. I would give up the 20 knotts and fly the Bonanza. I understand your thinking flying over water and at night. I fly at night I dont mind it to much in the Bonanza with the autopilot I fly a Cherokee 180 also and I dont feel as comortable at night. I was thinking maybe a twin comanche. "kontiki" wrote in message ... I would stay away from a duchess, sorry. If you really think you need a twin I'd echo what the others have said and be thinking Aztec or maybe a Baron (but I'd look at the Aztec first). |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Guys,
Well it is nice to know that there are actually a few things we agree on out there! One more thing well actually a a few more things. Think annual costs! Single versus Multi your probably talking a min of 500-1000 more just for the annual at a reputable shop not to mention the fact that when you start having stuff go wrong ie 35-65 g for a new motor 5-15g for a new prop jack and retract tests hoses. This stuff really adds up pretty fast. Also just to help stear you clear of a twin commanche though it is one if not the best of the group performance wise as far as economical and fast the parts have all but dissapeared for them. Try to stay away from any of the commanches just for that one fact alone. Parts is parts and if you cant find any your in a whole with no airplane not to mention if there ever was an accident it would probably be a total loss and that is why they are so hard to insure now! I say A36 would more than fit your needs. I know of a few people that have actually gone back to bonanza's and sold their barrons. just for fuel burn alone. To be truthfull with you also the baron is just as fast as the baby barons{55's) and not much slower than the big ones 58's. With the exception of a few special models {58p and the E55} both are faster. Well I could literally talk airplanes all night.{why am I not out playing in the air right now} Have a great day all. Matty/huck com asel amel inst CFI CFII 1500 TT Aluckyguess wrote: My flying buddy had a Duchess about 10 years ago. It was a great plane. He now has a Barron, the Barron is nice real nice the only problem is fuel. I hate going on long trips because it cost to much. I would give up the 20 knotts and fly the Bonanza. I understand your thinking flying over water and at night. I fly at night I dont mind it to much in the Bonanza with the autopilot I fly a Cherokee 180 also and I dont feel as comortable at night. I was thinking maybe a twin comanche. "kontiki" wrote in message ... I would stay away from a duchess, sorry. If you really think you need a twin I'd echo what the others have said and be thinking Aztec or maybe a Baron (but I'd look at the Aztec first). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wish my cherokee 180 would do 160 Knots. I would put a garmin 430 and an
s-tec in it and call it good. "Huck" wrote in message ups.com... Hey Guys, Well it is nice to know that there are actually a few things we agree on out there! One more thing well actually a a few more things. Think annual costs! Single versus Multi your probably talking a min of 500-1000 more just for the annual at a reputable shop not to mention the fact that when you start having stuff go wrong ie 35-65 g for a new motor 5-15g for a new prop jack and retract tests hoses. This stuff really adds up pretty fast. Also just to help stear you clear of a twin commanche though it is one if not the best of the group performance wise as far as economical and fast the parts have all but dissapeared for them. Try to stay away from any of the commanches just for that one fact alone. Parts is parts and if you cant find any your in a whole with no airplane not to mention if there ever was an accident it would probably be a total loss and that is why they are so hard to insure now! I say A36 would more than fit your needs. I know of a few people that have actually gone back to bonanza's and sold their barrons. just for fuel burn alone. To be truthfull with you also the baron is just as fast as the baby barons{55's) and not much slower than the big ones 58's. With the exception of a few special models {58p and the E55} both are faster. Well I could literally talk airplanes all night.{why am I not out playing in the air right now} Have a great day all. Matty/huck com asel amel inst CFI CFII 1500 TT Aluckyguess wrote: My flying buddy had a Duchess about 10 years ago. It was a great plane. He now has a Barron, the Barron is nice real nice the only problem is fuel. I hate going on long trips because it cost to much. I would give up the 20 knotts and fly the Bonanza. I understand your thinking flying over water and at night. I fly at night I dont mind it to much in the Bonanza with the autopilot I fly a Cherokee 180 also and I dont feel as comortable at night. I was thinking maybe a twin comanche. "kontiki" wrote in message ... I would stay away from a duchess, sorry. If you really think you need a twin I'd echo what the others have said and be thinking Aztec or maybe a Baron (but I'd look at the Aztec first). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
comment period reopened on DC area "ADIZ" | Bob Noel | Piloting | 3 | November 15th 05 04:39 PM |
Comments on FAA NPRM urgently needed | [email protected] | Piloting | 39 | October 15th 05 01:06 AM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 03:58 PM |
AIRNAV not publishing fuel prices... | Victor | Owning | 77 | February 22nd 04 12:02 AM |