A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why don't voice radio communications use FM?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 3rd 06, 08:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Logajan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,958
Default Why don't voice radio communications use FM?

Mxsmanic wrote:
Dan Luke writes:

******** again. I have a radio that does actively remove noise--it
has a button to turn the feature on and off, and it works quite well.


What kind of noise does it remove, and how does it distinguish noise
from signal?


One proven way to reduce noise is to repeat the signal N times and the
receiver adds up the repetitions and eventually the noise averages to zero
while the signal does not. Of course this is not what is done in practice
in real communications.

(I once wrote software for a Tunneling Electron Microscope (TEM) that did
the above - the target object is repeatedly scanned and the scans are
basically averaged - the noise falls off. Though IIRC, the amplitude of the
noise drops by a factor of 1/sqrt(N) for N scans. I'm too lazy to look it
up so that might not be the correct factor.)
  #2  
Old September 4th 06, 12:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default Why don't voice radio communications use FM?

One proven way to reduce noise is to repeat the signal N times and the
receiver adds up the repetitions and eventually the noise averages to zero
while the signal does not. Of course this is not what is done in practice
in real communications.


Actually, doesn't more transmitter power effectively accomplish that?
(the signal is essentially repeated N times, at the same time)

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #3  
Old September 4th 06, 01:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Logajan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,958
Default Why don't voice radio communications use FM?

Jose wrote:
One proven way to reduce noise is to repeat the signal N times and
the receiver adds up the repetitions and eventually the noise
averages to zero while the signal does not. Of course this is not
what is done in practice in real communications.


Actually, doesn't more transmitter power effectively accomplish that?
(the signal is essentially repeated N times, at the same time)


The unstated assumption is of course that the transmitter is running at
full power output. Once you've done that, the question is what other tricks
are there to increase the range the signals can be detected.
  #4  
Old September 4th 06, 08:22 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Why don't voice radio communications use FM?

Jose writes:

Actually, doesn't more transmitter power effectively accomplish that?
(the signal is essentially repeated N times, at the same time)


Yes.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder John Doe Piloting 145 March 31st 06 06:58 PM
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? Ric Home Built 2 September 13th 05 09:39 PM
I Hate Radios Ron Wanttaja Home Built 9 June 6th 05 05:39 PM
AirCraft Radio Communications [email protected] Rotorcraft 0 November 13th 03 12:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.