A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NATCA Going Down in Flames



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 6th 06, 03:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Lee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 295
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames

Emily wrote:

Jay Honeck wrote:
So.. how much would you be willing to pay, per use, for this privatized
ATC that you advocate?


Zero. I would fly VFR, without them.


How could you get away with flying VFR 100% of the time?


A privatized ATC and GA user fees may not be tied to each other. But
let's assume GA fees for ATC services. Very likely many GA pilots,
including myself, will reduce or eliminate the use of those services.

That brings us to the law of unintended consequences. A lamebrain
Congress institutes GA user fees. Where before I get traffic
advisories when puttering above my airport to ensure safety and
facilitate commercial aircraft arrival/departures, now I blow it off.
I have already had one near-miss with a CRJ around 9000' MSL (not
high above the ground here). Cases like that are bound to increase.
In addition, since the local ATC cannot ask me to change directions
commercial aircraft will have to change directions to avoid me at an
unverified altitude.

One scenario is an economic detriment. The other risks many lives.

Ron Lee



  #2  
Old September 6th 06, 03:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames

But
let's assume GA fees for ATC services. Very likely many GA pilots,
including myself, will reduce or eliminate the use of those services.


When that happens, the now privatized ATC will probably petition the FAA
for rules mandating ATC contact. They already mandate "weather" briefings.

In addition, since the local ATC cannot ask me to change directions
commercial aircraft will have to change directions to avoid me at an
unverified altitude.


This will be used as a reason to require positive control. Likely the
floor of the A could be brought down to Great Britan levels.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #3  
Old September 6th 06, 02:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dylan Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 530
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames

On 2006-09-06, Jose wrote:
This will be used as a reason to require positive control. Likely the
floor of the A could be brought down to Great Britan levels.


The floor of class A in Great Britain (most of the British Isles is
class G airspace up to FL245) is only low in a few places. In a light
plane (anythign under 2 metric tonnes) you aren't charged any ATC fees.

--
Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid.
Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An ACE goes down in flames. PoBoy Naval Aviation 25 December 9th 05 01:30 PM
AOPA and ATC Privatization Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 139 November 12th 03 08:26 PM
AOPA and ATC Privatization Chip Jones Piloting 133 November 12th 03 08:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.