![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:14:35 -0500, Roger wrote:
I was lucky I had instructors who put me through a lot of IMC right down to minimums so by the time I received my rating I felt competent (and comfortable) to fly down to minimums and did. I really have to agree with Roger here! I had two instructors in my IFR training. My first instructor took me on days that were down to ILS minimums at HKS. My second instructor will not fly in solid IMC for any period of time. The second instructors opinion was that the purpose of an IFR ticket in a single engine was to climb through the deck, get on top, and then decend through the deck and land. My first instructor on the other hand had me fly 2.4 in solid IMC doing approaches and gave me the confidence to remain in IMC. Talk about bringing up the confidence level, as when I did my first IFR approaches after getting my ticket, it was 900 ceiling at HKS, and I felt like I had a ton of time after breaking out to make the runway. I had my first hold in solid IMC just three weeks ago, so again, because my first instructor gave me the confidence, it really was no big deal. Just rather boring going circles for 15 minutes. So, depending on your instructor, probably will dictate your own confidence level. After all, you practice down to minimums under the hood, it's no different then in IMC. As far as passengers, I took my wife up for her first trip. Granted, she has been great throughout my flying experiences, but she was not comfortable in solid IMC. It was smooth as silk, and we were in IMC for 40 minutes until I got on top at 8000 feet further down the road. She didn't like the fact that she felt like a "speck" with no visual references. So, each passenger will have their own tolerences. To be honest, I wouldn't hesitate to take a passenger up in IMC, as if you treat it as "normal", the passenger will not know any difference anyway. It's when the pilot shows some concern, that the passenger will pick up on that concern. As far as comfort, turbulence has the most impact on passengers from my experiences. Smooth air, and IMC really doesn't bother a passenger who thinks it's perfectly normal. Allen |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , A Lieberman
writes: As far as passengers, I took my wife up for her first trip. Granted, she has been great throughout my flying experiences, but she was not comfortable in solid IMC. It was smooth as silk, and we were in IMC for 40 minutes until I got on top at 8000 feet further down the road. She didn't like the fact that she felt like a "speck" with no visual references. So, each passenger will have their own tolerences. Boy, you can say that again about "their own tolerences". The first time my instructor took me into IMC I got a bit on edge and he said, "Just remember how you felt today and understand how your wife is going to feel the first time." Well in our first IMC flight I tried to brief the wife and when we entered the clouds I kept asking how she felt and she kept saying "No problem, why are you asking?" Now hit a few bumps and she is "Let's get this thing down - NOW" So go figure. Chuck |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Good plans-built Light Sport Aircraft | Rob Schneider | Home Built | 15 | August 19th 04 05:50 PM |
DCPilots for Washington, DC area pilots | Bill | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | June 5th 04 12:32 AM |
Bush Pilots Fly-In. South Africa. | Bush Air | Home Built | 0 | May 25th 04 06:18 AM |
bulding a kitplane maybe Van's RV9A --- a good idea ????? | Flightdeck | Home Built | 10 | September 9th 03 07:20 PM |