![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, yes and no.
Yes for some like me; no for some like Emily. Well, it's a bit more than that. Flying in the DC area without talking to anyone is hard. (at least doing it more than once is hard!). Flying in weather without talking to ATC can be hard in many areas of the country where it would be easy VFR, and when that area doesn't have much VFR, that "adds value" to ATC services. (Many areas like that don't have much spam can IFR either). And although you may be able to "fly" without talking to anyone, this doesn't help if you can't get where you're going without them. It's not just Emily (although I will say she paints a bleaker picture than I think is warranted). And if a privatized ATC starts charging for services, and finds that they are not making enough money because spam cans demure, then it is not out of the question that the FAA will require, somehow, that spam cans procure more ATC services. All speculation, but intertwined. We are lucky to have the system we have, but we need to be vigliant that it doesn't get sold, piece by piece, like the DC area did, as each of us who is not directly affected, poo poohs the idea that it could come to reach us. Jose -- There are more ways to skin a cat than there are cats. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An ACE goes down in flames. | PoBoy | Naval Aviation | 25 | December 9th 05 01:30 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 139 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Piloting | 133 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |