![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, we all see the connection.
How are they planning to avoid hang and paragliders? The BGA has made a response as an organisation to the recent PRIA, it is to be found at http://www.gliding.co.uk/forms/BGARIAResponseFinal.doc for the response document, and at http://www.gliding.co.uk/forms/Email...rLetterRIA.pdf for the covering letter. There were some 3,000 responses sent to the DAP. On UAVs the BGA says in Response 1 Issue 6: "Issue 6. The BGA believes strongly that it is totally unacceptable that existing airspace users should be disadvantaged or burdened as UAV traffic develops in the future." It is confounded cheek for commercial interests to think they can fly UAVs wherever they like and we shall just have to suffer the inconvenience or worse to accommodate them. They would never dream of doing this on the roads, why in the sky? As to the example quoted in the BBC of an UAV "seeing" something the human eye would have missed, this can equally easily be done with sensors fitted to manned aircraft. The military use UAVs partly to avoid people being shot down in a war situation. W.J. (Bill) Dean (U.K.). Remove "ic" to reply. "Tom Gardner" wrote in message 43.53... "W.J. \(Bill\) Dean \(U.K.\)." wrote in : Fitting a transponder would do hardly anything to reduce collision risk for most gliding in the UK. It will only help those who can and want to fly high in wave. I note that there are moves to have unmanned aircraft (UAVs) flying in UK airspace, e.g. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/5198364.stm The current rules and procedures presume that all aircraft contain functioning eyeballs and brains that can look out the window. If they don't then the rules and procedures have to be rethought. Anybody see a connection with mandatory transponders? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
W.J. (Bill) Dean (U.K.). wrote:
Yes, we all see the connection. How are they planning to avoid hang and paragliders? By mandating mode-S + ADS-B transponders for them too. There is some exemption clause for paragliders until the technology catches up. Probably until some avionics marketeer says so. I'm really looking forward to carrying a 600W microwave transmitter and associated battery. :-( Iwo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 6th 06 11:13 PM |
Yet another A36 crash | H.P. | Piloting | 10 | April 23rd 05 05:58 PM |
Seniors Contest | Bob Fidler | Soaring | 68 | March 17th 05 03:50 AM |
Sport Pilot - School Won't Offer | Gary G | Piloting | 38 | February 16th 05 10:41 AM |
Announce/USA: FAA Glider Flying Handbook / Bob Wander | SoarBooks | Soaring | 0 | August 11th 03 03:55 PM |